Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Best use of the recommended IFCC reference method, material and values in HbA1C analyses.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2005; 65(6):453-62.SJ

Abstract

The results of Finnish HbA(1C) surveys (Labquality Ltd.) during the past 10 years have undergone continuous improvement with smaller overall coefficients of variation for the HbA(1C) mean values of all methods (from 7.5 to 5.4% for normal and from 8.9 to 4.7% for diabetic samples). Most of the HbA(1C) methods are certified for traceability to the Diabetes Control and Complication Trial (DCCT) designated comparison method, which originally was a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method (Bio-Rex 70, Bio-Rad) but is no longer in routine use. It was therefore important that the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) had prepared both reference preparations and method for the determination of HbA(1C). However, the very demanding reference method is not realistic for use in clinical laboratories. According to the present study, the mean HbA(1C) values of the Labquality Ltd. showed significant correlations to the HbA(1C) values of The European Reference Laboratory for Glycohemoglobin (r = 0.999) and to the values using the IFCC method (r = 0.999). The reference values of the IFCC method (mainly those of the manufacturer) range from 2.85 to 3.81%, being significantly lower than the present DCCT values (4.0-6.1%). Since it may take some time before consumers are ready to accept the new IFCC reference values for general use, we propose that the IFCC reference materials and method should be used for calibration of the present methods to the well-known DCCT levels.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16179278

Citation

Penttilä, I M., et al. "Best Use of the Recommended IFCC Reference Method, Material and Values in HbA1C Analyses." Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, vol. 65, no. 6, 2005, pp. 453-62.
Penttilä IM, Halonen T, Punnonen K, et al. Best use of the recommended IFCC reference method, material and values in HbA1C analyses. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2005;65(6):453-62.
Penttilä, I. M., Halonen, T., Punnonen, K., & Tiikkainen, U. (2005). Best use of the recommended IFCC reference method, material and values in HbA1C analyses. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 65(6), 453-62.
Penttilä IM, et al. Best Use of the Recommended IFCC Reference Method, Material and Values in HbA1C Analyses. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2005;65(6):453-62. PubMed PMID: 16179278.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Best use of the recommended IFCC reference method, material and values in HbA1C analyses. AU - Penttilä,I M, AU - Halonen,T, AU - Punnonen,K, AU - Tiikkainen,U, PY - 2005/9/24/pubmed PY - 2005/11/16/medline PY - 2005/9/24/entrez SP - 453 EP - 62 JF - Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation JO - Scand J Clin Lab Invest VL - 65 IS - 6 N2 - The results of Finnish HbA(1C) surveys (Labquality Ltd.) during the past 10 years have undergone continuous improvement with smaller overall coefficients of variation for the HbA(1C) mean values of all methods (from 7.5 to 5.4% for normal and from 8.9 to 4.7% for diabetic samples). Most of the HbA(1C) methods are certified for traceability to the Diabetes Control and Complication Trial (DCCT) designated comparison method, which originally was a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method (Bio-Rex 70, Bio-Rad) but is no longer in routine use. It was therefore important that the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) had prepared both reference preparations and method for the determination of HbA(1C). However, the very demanding reference method is not realistic for use in clinical laboratories. According to the present study, the mean HbA(1C) values of the Labquality Ltd. showed significant correlations to the HbA(1C) values of The European Reference Laboratory for Glycohemoglobin (r = 0.999) and to the values using the IFCC method (r = 0.999). The reference values of the IFCC method (mainly those of the manufacturer) range from 2.85 to 3.81%, being significantly lower than the present DCCT values (4.0-6.1%). Since it may take some time before consumers are ready to accept the new IFCC reference values for general use, we propose that the IFCC reference materials and method should be used for calibration of the present methods to the well-known DCCT levels. SN - 0036-5513 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16179278/Best_use_of_the_recommended_IFCC_reference_method_material_and_values_in_HbA1C_analyses_ L2 - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00365510510025809 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -