Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A urodynamics protocol to optimally assess men with post-prostatectomy incontinence.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2005; 24(7):622-6.NU

Abstract

AIMS

To propose a urodynamic protocol to comprehensively assess all parameters of post prostatectomy incontinence (PPI).

METHODS

Sixty men with a history of PPI after radical prostatectomy prospectively underwent a standardized video urodynamics protocol. A 7F urethral catheter was used for standard cystometry, abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP), and pressure flow measurements. The International Continence Society nomogram classified obstruction and further classification of obstruction was based on fluoro voiding cystourethrography and non-invasive flow rates (free Qmax).

RESULTS

Twenty-four (40%) men had detrusor overactivity with 8 (13%) also having detrusor overactivity incontinence. Only one patient had impaired compliance. All men had urodynamic stress incontinence, but 21 (35%) men demonstrated it only after removal of the urethral catheter. For men leaking with and without the urethral catheter, the respective ALPP was significantly different, 86.3 and 67 cmH2O, respectively (P = 0.002). The men who leaked only in the absence of the urethral catheter had significantly higher ALPP measurements, P < 0.001. After reclassification using the fluoroscopic images of the bladder outlet and free Qmax, only 13.3% patients were obstructed.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed urodynamic protocol allows for an optimal assessment of bladder and sphincter dysfunction and outlet obstruction in men with PPI.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16208638

Citation

Huckabay, Chad, et al. "A Urodynamics Protocol to Optimally Assess Men With Post-prostatectomy Incontinence." Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 24, no. 7, 2005, pp. 622-6.
Huckabay C, Twiss C, Berger A, et al. A urodynamics protocol to optimally assess men with post-prostatectomy incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(7):622-6.
Huckabay, C., Twiss, C., Berger, A., & Nitti, V. W. (2005). A urodynamics protocol to optimally assess men with post-prostatectomy incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 24(7), 622-6.
Huckabay C, et al. A Urodynamics Protocol to Optimally Assess Men With Post-prostatectomy Incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(7):622-6. PubMed PMID: 16208638.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - A urodynamics protocol to optimally assess men with post-prostatectomy incontinence. AU - Huckabay,Chad, AU - Twiss,Christian, AU - Berger,Aaron, AU - Nitti,Victor W, PY - 2005/10/7/pubmed PY - 2005/12/31/medline PY - 2005/10/7/entrez SP - 622 EP - 6 JF - Neurourology and urodynamics JO - Neurourol Urodyn VL - 24 IS - 7 N2 - AIMS: To propose a urodynamic protocol to comprehensively assess all parameters of post prostatectomy incontinence (PPI). METHODS: Sixty men with a history of PPI after radical prostatectomy prospectively underwent a standardized video urodynamics protocol. A 7F urethral catheter was used for standard cystometry, abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP), and pressure flow measurements. The International Continence Society nomogram classified obstruction and further classification of obstruction was based on fluoro voiding cystourethrography and non-invasive flow rates (free Qmax). RESULTS: Twenty-four (40%) men had detrusor overactivity with 8 (13%) also having detrusor overactivity incontinence. Only one patient had impaired compliance. All men had urodynamic stress incontinence, but 21 (35%) men demonstrated it only after removal of the urethral catheter. For men leaking with and without the urethral catheter, the respective ALPP was significantly different, 86.3 and 67 cmH2O, respectively (P = 0.002). The men who leaked only in the absence of the urethral catheter had significantly higher ALPP measurements, P < 0.001. After reclassification using the fluoroscopic images of the bladder outlet and free Qmax, only 13.3% patients were obstructed. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed urodynamic protocol allows for an optimal assessment of bladder and sphincter dysfunction and outlet obstruction in men with PPI. SN - 0733-2467 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16208638/A_urodynamics_protocol_to_optimally_assess_men_with_post_prostatectomy_incontinence_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20182 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -