Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods.
J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):132-8.JA

Abstract

The success of knee arthroplasty is dependent on many factors. Postoperative extremity and component alignment are important determinants of outcome and longevity. Malalignment (>3 degrees) results in higher failure rates. Computer-assisted navigation devices were developed to improve implant positioning. This study evaluated the early outcomes of a high-volume fellowship-trained surgeon relative to component positioning and limb alignment using an image-free navigation system. The navigation group consisted of 116 consecutive patients, and the conventional group consisted of 51 consecutive patients. The postoperative mechanical axis was within 3 degrees of neutral mechanical alignment in 95% of the navigation cases vs 84% of the conventional cases (P < .02). The range of the alignment and component position measurements narrowed, and the undesired outliers decreased. Accuracy was improved with navigation. Navigation was a viable device to improve the outcome of total knee arthroplasty relative to limb and component alignment.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Providence Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16214014

Citation

Anderson, Kevin C., et al. "Computer Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison With Conventional Methods." The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 20, no. 7 Suppl 3, 2005, pp. 132-8.
Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7 Suppl 3):132-8.
Anderson, K. C., Buehler, K. C., & Markel, D. C. (2005). Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 20(7 Suppl 3), 132-8.
Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison With Conventional Methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7 Suppl 3):132-8. PubMed PMID: 16214014.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. AU - Anderson,Kevin C, AU - Buehler,Knute C, AU - Markel,David C, PY - 2005/01/14/received PY - 2005/05/10/accepted PY - 2005/10/11/pubmed PY - 2006/4/6/medline PY - 2005/10/11/entrez SP - 132 EP - 8 JF - The Journal of arthroplasty JO - J Arthroplasty VL - 20 IS - 7 Suppl 3 N2 - The success of knee arthroplasty is dependent on many factors. Postoperative extremity and component alignment are important determinants of outcome and longevity. Malalignment (>3 degrees) results in higher failure rates. Computer-assisted navigation devices were developed to improve implant positioning. This study evaluated the early outcomes of a high-volume fellowship-trained surgeon relative to component positioning and limb alignment using an image-free navigation system. The navigation group consisted of 116 consecutive patients, and the conventional group consisted of 51 consecutive patients. The postoperative mechanical axis was within 3 degrees of neutral mechanical alignment in 95% of the navigation cases vs 84% of the conventional cases (P < .02). The range of the alignment and component position measurements narrowed, and the undesired outliers decreased. Accuracy was improved with navigation. Navigation was a viable device to improve the outcome of total knee arthroplasty relative to limb and component alignment. SN - 0883-5403 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16214014/Computer_assisted_navigation_in_total_knee_arthroplasty:_comparison_with_conventional_methods_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -