Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: a comparison between serum creatinine and cystatin C-based methods.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Dec; 16(12):3763-70.JA

Abstract

Accurate measurement of GFR is critical for the evaluation of new therapies and the care of renal transplant recipients. Although not accurate in renal transplantation, GFR is often estimated using creatinine-based equations. Cystatin C is a marker of GFR that seems to be more accurate than creatinine. Equations to predict GFR based on the serum cystatin C concentration have been developed, but their accuracy in transplantation is unknown. GFR was estimated using four equations (Filler, Le Bricon, Larsson, and Hoek) that are based on serum cystatin C and seven equations that are based on serum creatinine in 117 adult renal transplant recipients. GFR was measured using radiolabeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA), and the bias, precision, and accuracy of each equation were determined. The mean (99m)Tc-DTPA GFR was 58 +/- 23 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). The cystatin C-based equations of Filler and Le Bricon had the lowest bias (-1.7 and -3.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2), greatest precision (11.4 and 11.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2), and highest accuracy (87 and 89% within 30% of measured GFR, respectively). The cystatin C equations remained accurate even when the measured GFR was >60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The creatinine-based equations were not as accurate, with only 53 to 80% of estimates within 30% of measured GFR. Cystatin C-based equations are more accurate at predicting GFR in renal transplant recipients than traditional creatinine-based equations. Further prospective studies with repetitive measurement of cystatin C are needed to determine whether cystatin C-based estimates of GFR will be sufficiently accurate to monitor long-term allograft function.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16236805

Citation

White, Christine, et al. "Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Kidney Transplantation: a Comparison Between Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C-based Methods." Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, vol. 16, no. 12, 2005, pp. 3763-70.
White C, Akbari A, Hussain N, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: a comparison between serum creatinine and cystatin C-based methods. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(12):3763-70.
White, C., Akbari, A., Hussain, N., Dinh, L., Filler, G., Lepage, N., & Knoll, G. A. (2005). Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: a comparison between serum creatinine and cystatin C-based methods. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 16(12), 3763-70.
White C, et al. Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Kidney Transplantation: a Comparison Between Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C-based Methods. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(12):3763-70. PubMed PMID: 16236805.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: a comparison between serum creatinine and cystatin C-based methods. AU - White,Christine, AU - Akbari,Ayub, AU - Hussain,Naser, AU - Dinh,Laurent, AU - Filler,Guido, AU - Lepage,Nathalie, AU - Knoll,Greg A, Y1 - 2005/10/19/ PY - 2005/10/21/pubmed PY - 2006/4/28/medline PY - 2005/10/21/entrez SP - 3763 EP - 70 JF - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN JO - J Am Soc Nephrol VL - 16 IS - 12 N2 - Accurate measurement of GFR is critical for the evaluation of new therapies and the care of renal transplant recipients. Although not accurate in renal transplantation, GFR is often estimated using creatinine-based equations. Cystatin C is a marker of GFR that seems to be more accurate than creatinine. Equations to predict GFR based on the serum cystatin C concentration have been developed, but their accuracy in transplantation is unknown. GFR was estimated using four equations (Filler, Le Bricon, Larsson, and Hoek) that are based on serum cystatin C and seven equations that are based on serum creatinine in 117 adult renal transplant recipients. GFR was measured using radiolabeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA), and the bias, precision, and accuracy of each equation were determined. The mean (99m)Tc-DTPA GFR was 58 +/- 23 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). The cystatin C-based equations of Filler and Le Bricon had the lowest bias (-1.7 and -3.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2), greatest precision (11.4 and 11.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2), and highest accuracy (87 and 89% within 30% of measured GFR, respectively). The cystatin C equations remained accurate even when the measured GFR was >60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The creatinine-based equations were not as accurate, with only 53 to 80% of estimates within 30% of measured GFR. Cystatin C-based equations are more accurate at predicting GFR in renal transplant recipients than traditional creatinine-based equations. Further prospective studies with repetitive measurement of cystatin C are needed to determine whether cystatin C-based estimates of GFR will be sufficiently accurate to monitor long-term allograft function. SN - 1046-6673 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16236805/Estimating_glomerular_filtration_rate_in_kidney_transplantation:_a_comparison_between_serum_creatinine_and_cystatin_C_based_methods_ L2 - https://jasn.asnjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=16236805 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -