Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites.
J Dent. 2006 Jul; 34(6):372-80.JD

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Effect of a dentin adhesive system containing antibacterial monomer-MDPB (Clearfil Protect Bond) on the shear bond strength of all-ceramic-IPS Empress 2 restorations luted with three different dual-polymerizing systems (Variolink 2, RelyX ARC and Panavia F 2.0) to dentin was investigated.

METHODS

One hundred and eight all-ceramic discs (2 x 3mm; IPS Empress 2) were fabricated and ultrasonically cleaned. The buccal surfaces of 108 non-carious extracted human premolars were flattened to expose dentin and subsequently polished with 600-grit wet silicon carbide paper. Three dual-polymerizing luting systems had test groups and control groups consisting of 18 samples each. For the test groups Clearfil Protect Bond was applied to the exposed dentin surfaces. Control groups received the original bonding procedures of each adhesive system. After the all-ceramic samples were luted to the teeth, thermocycling was performed 5000 times. Shear bond strengths were tested using Shimadzu Universal Testing Machine until failure. Analysis of fractured dentin surfaces were performed using Optical Microscope at x10 and x1000 magnifications and the images were analyzed with Image Analyzer. Data was analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test at a significance level of p<0.05.

RESULTS

Mean shear bond strength data of the groups in MPa were; Variolink: 20.45+/-4.75, Variolink+Clearfil Protect Bond:29.32+/-2.37, RelyX ARC:18.82+/-3.19, RelyX ARC+Clearfil Protect Bond:25.58+/-4.05, Panavia F 2.0:17.11+/-2.98, Panavia F 2.0+Clearfil Protect Bond:24.40+/-7.46. Application of the antibacterial adhesive increased the shear bond strengths of all three dual-polymerizing systems to dentin (p=0.00). The surface analysis showed that most of the specimens showed the adhesive failure mode between the dentin and the composite luting agent interface.

CONCLUSION

The antibacterial adhesive system Clearfil Protect Bond can be safely used to prevent the potential risk of complications resulting from bacterial activity regardless of affecting the bond strength of IPS Empress 2 restorations luted with the dual-polimerizing systems used in this study.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ege University, 35100 Bornova-Izmir, Turkey. eb_cal@yahoo.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16288949

Citation

Cal, Ebru, et al. "Effect of an Antibacterial Adhesive On the Bond Strength of Three Different Luting Resin Composites." Journal of Dentistry, vol. 34, no. 6, 2006, pp. 372-80.
Cal E, Türkün LS, Türkün M, et al. Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites. J Dent. 2006;34(6):372-80.
Cal, E., Türkün, L. S., Türkün, M., Toman, M., & Toksavul, S. (2006). Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites. Journal of Dentistry, 34(6), 372-80.
Cal E, et al. Effect of an Antibacterial Adhesive On the Bond Strength of Three Different Luting Resin Composites. J Dent. 2006;34(6):372-80. PubMed PMID: 16288949.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites. AU - Cal,Ebru, AU - Türkün,L Sebnem, AU - Türkün,Murat, AU - Toman,Muhittin, AU - Toksavul,Suna, Y1 - 2005/11/09/ PY - 2005/06/15/received PY - 2005/08/05/revised PY - 2005/08/30/accepted PY - 2005/11/18/pubmed PY - 2006/11/1/medline PY - 2005/11/18/entrez SP - 372 EP - 80 JF - Journal of dentistry JO - J Dent VL - 34 IS - 6 N2 - OBJECTIVES: Effect of a dentin adhesive system containing antibacterial monomer-MDPB (Clearfil Protect Bond) on the shear bond strength of all-ceramic-IPS Empress 2 restorations luted with three different dual-polymerizing systems (Variolink 2, RelyX ARC and Panavia F 2.0) to dentin was investigated. METHODS: One hundred and eight all-ceramic discs (2 x 3mm; IPS Empress 2) were fabricated and ultrasonically cleaned. The buccal surfaces of 108 non-carious extracted human premolars were flattened to expose dentin and subsequently polished with 600-grit wet silicon carbide paper. Three dual-polymerizing luting systems had test groups and control groups consisting of 18 samples each. For the test groups Clearfil Protect Bond was applied to the exposed dentin surfaces. Control groups received the original bonding procedures of each adhesive system. After the all-ceramic samples were luted to the teeth, thermocycling was performed 5000 times. Shear bond strengths were tested using Shimadzu Universal Testing Machine until failure. Analysis of fractured dentin surfaces were performed using Optical Microscope at x10 and x1000 magnifications and the images were analyzed with Image Analyzer. Data was analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test at a significance level of p<0.05. RESULTS: Mean shear bond strength data of the groups in MPa were; Variolink: 20.45+/-4.75, Variolink+Clearfil Protect Bond:29.32+/-2.37, RelyX ARC:18.82+/-3.19, RelyX ARC+Clearfil Protect Bond:25.58+/-4.05, Panavia F 2.0:17.11+/-2.98, Panavia F 2.0+Clearfil Protect Bond:24.40+/-7.46. Application of the antibacterial adhesive increased the shear bond strengths of all three dual-polymerizing systems to dentin (p=0.00). The surface analysis showed that most of the specimens showed the adhesive failure mode between the dentin and the composite luting agent interface. CONCLUSION: The antibacterial adhesive system Clearfil Protect Bond can be safely used to prevent the potential risk of complications resulting from bacterial activity regardless of affecting the bond strength of IPS Empress 2 restorations luted with the dual-polimerizing systems used in this study. SN - 0300-5712 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16288949/Effect_of_an_antibacterial_adhesive_on_the_bond_strength_of_three_different_luting_resin_composites_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0300-5712(05)00164-8 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -