Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management methods: Ankara case study.
Environ Int. 2006 Apr; 32(3):405-11.EI

Abstract

Different solid waste management system scenarios were developed and compared for the Municipal Solid Waste Management System of Ankara by using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The solid waste management methods considered in the scenarios were collection and transportation of wastes, source reduction, Material Recovery Facility (MRF)/Transfer Stations (TS), incineration, anaerobic digestion and landfilling. The goal of the study was to determine the most environmentally friendly option of MSWM system for Ankara. The functional unit of the study was the amount of solid waste generated in the system area of concern, which are the districts of Ankara. The life cycle inventory analysis was carried out by IWM Model-1. The inputs and outputs of each management stage were defined and the inventory emissions calculated by the model were classified in to impact categories; non-renewable energy sources exhausting potential, final solid waste as hazardous and non-hazardous, global warming, acidification, eutrophication and human toxicity. The impacts were quantified with the weighing factors of each category to develop the environmental profiles of each scenario. In most of the categories, Source Reduction Scenario was found to be the most feasible management method, except the global warming category. The lowest contribution to GWP was calculated for the anaerobic digestion process. In the interpretation and improvement assessment stage, the results were further evaluated and recommendations were made to improve the current solid waste management system of Ankara.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Environmental Engineering, Middle East Technical University, 06531 Ankara, Turkey.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16310852

Citation

Ozeler, D, et al. "Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management Methods: Ankara Case Study." Environment International, vol. 32, no. 3, 2006, pp. 405-11.
Ozeler D, Yetiş U, Demirer GN. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management methods: Ankara case study. Environ Int. 2006;32(3):405-11.
Ozeler, D., Yetiş, U., & Demirer, G. N. (2006). Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management methods: Ankara case study. Environment International, 32(3), 405-11.
Ozeler D, Yetiş U, Demirer GN. Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management Methods: Ankara Case Study. Environ Int. 2006;32(3):405-11. PubMed PMID: 16310852.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management methods: Ankara case study. AU - Ozeler,D, AU - Yetiş,U, AU - Demirer,G N, Y1 - 2005/11/28/ PY - 2005/07/30/received PY - 2005/08/17/revised PY - 2005/10/06/accepted PY - 2005/11/29/pubmed PY - 2006/9/16/medline PY - 2005/11/29/entrez SP - 405 EP - 11 JF - Environment international JO - Environ Int VL - 32 IS - 3 N2 - Different solid waste management system scenarios were developed and compared for the Municipal Solid Waste Management System of Ankara by using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The solid waste management methods considered in the scenarios were collection and transportation of wastes, source reduction, Material Recovery Facility (MRF)/Transfer Stations (TS), incineration, anaerobic digestion and landfilling. The goal of the study was to determine the most environmentally friendly option of MSWM system for Ankara. The functional unit of the study was the amount of solid waste generated in the system area of concern, which are the districts of Ankara. The life cycle inventory analysis was carried out by IWM Model-1. The inputs and outputs of each management stage were defined and the inventory emissions calculated by the model were classified in to impact categories; non-renewable energy sources exhausting potential, final solid waste as hazardous and non-hazardous, global warming, acidification, eutrophication and human toxicity. The impacts were quantified with the weighing factors of each category to develop the environmental profiles of each scenario. In most of the categories, Source Reduction Scenario was found to be the most feasible management method, except the global warming category. The lowest contribution to GWP was calculated for the anaerobic digestion process. In the interpretation and improvement assessment stage, the results were further evaluated and recommendations were made to improve the current solid waste management system of Ankara. SN - 0160-4120 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16310852/Life_cycle_assessment_of_municipal_solid_waste_management_methods:_Ankara_case_study_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -