Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.
Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov; 75(6):948-52.AO

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to examine the dental arch width changes of extraction and nonextraction treatment in Class I patients. The study was performed on pretreatment and posttreatment dental casts of 60 patients (30 extraction and 30 nonextraction). The mean ages were 14.3 +/- 2.02 years for the extraction group and 14.1 +/- 2.9 years for the nonextraction group. The maxillary and mandibular crowding was -6.7 +/- 3.1 and -6.3 +/- 2.8 mm for the extraction group and -4.5 +/- 3.6 and -2.1 +/- 3.5 mm for the nonextraction group, respectively. The intercanine and intermolar arch width measurements were measured using a digital caliper. Paired samples t-test was used to evaluate the treatment changes within each group. To compare the changes between groups, independent samples t-test was performed. At the start of treatment, the maxillary and the mandibular intercanine and intermolar widths of both groups did not differ statistically. At the end of treatment, maxillary and mandibular intercanine widths of both groups increased significantly. The mandibular intermolar width decreased significantly for the extraction group and the maxillary intermolar width increased significantly for the nonextraction group. The decrease in maxillary intermolar width for the extraction group and the increase in mandibular intermolar width for the nonextraction group were not significantly different. No differences were observed between the groups in maxillary and mandibular intercanine widths. Maxillary and mandibular intermolar width indicated a significantly larger value in the nonextraction group than that in the extraction group.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey. mugepeh@hacettepe.edu.trNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16448236

Citation

Aksu, Muge, and Ilken Kocadereli. "Arch Width Changes in Extraction and Nonextraction Treatment in Class I Patients." The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 75, no. 6, 2005, pp. 948-52.
Aksu M, Kocadereli I. Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(6):948-52.
Aksu, M., & Kocadereli, I. (2005). Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients. The Angle Orthodontist, 75(6), 948-52.
Aksu M, Kocadereli I. Arch Width Changes in Extraction and Nonextraction Treatment in Class I Patients. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(6):948-52. PubMed PMID: 16448236.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients. AU - Aksu,Muge, AU - Kocadereli,Ilken, PY - 2006/2/2/pubmed PY - 2006/3/17/medline PY - 2006/2/2/entrez SP - 948 EP - 52 JF - The Angle orthodontist JO - Angle Orthod VL - 75 IS - 6 N2 - The aim of this retrospective study was to examine the dental arch width changes of extraction and nonextraction treatment in Class I patients. The study was performed on pretreatment and posttreatment dental casts of 60 patients (30 extraction and 30 nonextraction). The mean ages were 14.3 +/- 2.02 years for the extraction group and 14.1 +/- 2.9 years for the nonextraction group. The maxillary and mandibular crowding was -6.7 +/- 3.1 and -6.3 +/- 2.8 mm for the extraction group and -4.5 +/- 3.6 and -2.1 +/- 3.5 mm for the nonextraction group, respectively. The intercanine and intermolar arch width measurements were measured using a digital caliper. Paired samples t-test was used to evaluate the treatment changes within each group. To compare the changes between groups, independent samples t-test was performed. At the start of treatment, the maxillary and the mandibular intercanine and intermolar widths of both groups did not differ statistically. At the end of treatment, maxillary and mandibular intercanine widths of both groups increased significantly. The mandibular intermolar width decreased significantly for the extraction group and the maxillary intermolar width increased significantly for the nonextraction group. The decrease in maxillary intermolar width for the extraction group and the increase in mandibular intermolar width for the nonextraction group were not significantly different. No differences were observed between the groups in maxillary and mandibular intercanine widths. Maxillary and mandibular intermolar width indicated a significantly larger value in the nonextraction group than that in the extraction group. SN - 0003-3219 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16448236/Arch_width_changes_in_extraction_and_nonextraction_treatment_in_class_I_patients_ L2 - https://meridian.allenpress.com/angle-orthodontist/article-lookup/doi/10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[948:AWCIEA]2.0.CO;2 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -