Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of haemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with GlideScope videolaryngoscope and fibreoptic bronchoscope.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun; 23(6):522-6.EJ

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The GlideScope videolaryngoscope is a newly developed laryngoscope for tracheal intubation recently introduced into clinical anaesthesia. In this randomised clinical study, we compared the haemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation using a GlideScope videolaryngoscope and a fibreoptic bronchoscope.

METHODS

Fifty-six adult patients, ASA I-II scheduled for elective plastic surgery under general anaesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were randomly allocated to either the GlideScope videolaryngoscope group or the fibreoptic bronchoscope group. After a standard intravenous anaesthetic induction, orotracheal intubation was performed. Noninvasive blood pressure and heart rate were recorded before and after induction, at intubation and for 5 min after intubation at 1 min intervals.

RESULTS

As compared with the post-induction values the orotracheal intubations using a fibreoptic bronchoscope and a GlideScope videolaryngoscope resulted in the significant increases in blood pressures which did not exceed their baseline values. In the two groups, heart rates at intubation and within 2 min after intubation were significantly higher than their baseline values. However, there were no significant differences in blood pressures and heart rates at all time points, their maximal values and maximal percent changes during the observation and the times required to reach their maximal values between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The orotracheal intubations using a fibreoptic bronchoscope and a GlideScope videolaryngoscope produce similar haemodynamic responses.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Anaesthesiology, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. FruitXue@yahoo.com.cnNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16507195

Citation

Xue, F S., et al. "Comparison of Haemodynamic Responses to Orotracheal Intubation With GlideScope Videolaryngoscope and Fibreoptic Bronchoscope." European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 23, no. 6, 2006, pp. 522-6.
Xue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, et al. Comparison of haemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with GlideScope videolaryngoscope and fibreoptic bronchoscope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23(6):522-6.
Xue, F. S., Zhang, G. H., Li, X. Y., Sun, H. T., Li, P., Sun, H. Y., Xu, Y. C., & Liu, Y. (2006). Comparison of haemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with GlideScope videolaryngoscope and fibreoptic bronchoscope. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 23(6), 522-6.
Xue FS, et al. Comparison of Haemodynamic Responses to Orotracheal Intubation With GlideScope Videolaryngoscope and Fibreoptic Bronchoscope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23(6):522-6. PubMed PMID: 16507195.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of haemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with GlideScope videolaryngoscope and fibreoptic bronchoscope. AU - Xue,F S, AU - Zhang,G H, AU - Li,X Y, AU - Sun,H T, AU - Li,P, AU - Sun,H Y, AU - Xu,Y C, AU - Liu,Y, Y1 - 2006/03/01/ PY - 2006/01/12/accepted PY - 2006/3/2/pubmed PY - 2006/12/9/medline PY - 2006/3/2/entrez SP - 522 EP - 6 JF - European journal of anaesthesiology JO - Eur J Anaesthesiol VL - 23 IS - 6 N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The GlideScope videolaryngoscope is a newly developed laryngoscope for tracheal intubation recently introduced into clinical anaesthesia. In this randomised clinical study, we compared the haemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation using a GlideScope videolaryngoscope and a fibreoptic bronchoscope. METHODS: Fifty-six adult patients, ASA I-II scheduled for elective plastic surgery under general anaesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were randomly allocated to either the GlideScope videolaryngoscope group or the fibreoptic bronchoscope group. After a standard intravenous anaesthetic induction, orotracheal intubation was performed. Noninvasive blood pressure and heart rate were recorded before and after induction, at intubation and for 5 min after intubation at 1 min intervals. RESULTS: As compared with the post-induction values the orotracheal intubations using a fibreoptic bronchoscope and a GlideScope videolaryngoscope resulted in the significant increases in blood pressures which did not exceed their baseline values. In the two groups, heart rates at intubation and within 2 min after intubation were significantly higher than their baseline values. However, there were no significant differences in blood pressures and heart rates at all time points, their maximal values and maximal percent changes during the observation and the times required to reach their maximal values between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The orotracheal intubations using a fibreoptic bronchoscope and a GlideScope videolaryngoscope produce similar haemodynamic responses. SN - 0265-0215 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16507195/Comparison_of_haemodynamic_responses_to_orotracheal_intubation_with_GlideScope_videolaryngoscope_and_fibreoptic_bronchoscope_ L2 - http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=linkout&SEARCH=16507195.ui DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -