Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Cancer. 2006 Jun 01; 106(11):2318-26.C

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Within the Dutch MRI Screening (MRISC) study, a Dutch multicenter screening study for hereditary breast cancer, the authors investigated whether previously reported increased diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with mammography would be maintained during subsequent screening rounds.

METHODS

From November 1999 to October 2003, 1909 eligible women were included in the study. Screening parameters and tumor characteristics of different rounds were calculated and compared. The authors defined 3 different types of imaging screening rounds: first round in women never screened by imaging before, first round in women screened by imaging (mainly mammography) before, and subsequent rounds.

RESULTS

The difference in sensitivity for invasive cancers between mammography and MRI was largest in the first round of women previously screened with mammography (20.0 vs. 93.3%; P=.003), but also in subsequent rounds, there was a significant difference in favor of MRI (29.4 vs. 76.5%; P=.02). The difference in false-positive rate between mammography and MRI was also largest in the first round of women previously screened with mammography (5.5 vs. 14.0%; P<.001), and it remained significant in subsequent rounds (4.6 vs. 8.2%; P<.001). Screen-detected tumors were smaller and more often lymph node negative than symptomatic tumors in age-matched control patients, but no major differences in tumor stage were found between tumors detected at subsequent rounds compared with those in the first round.

CONCLUSIONS

In subsequent rounds, a significantly higher sensitivity and better discriminating capacity of MRI compared with mammography was maintained, and a favorable tumor stage compared with age-matched symptomatic controls. As results of these subsequent screening rounds were most predictive for long-term effects, the authors expect that this screening program will contribute to a decrease of breast cancer mortality in these high-risk women.

Authors+Show Affiliations

The Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic, Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16615112

Citation

Kriege, Mieke, et al. "Differences Between First and Subsequent Rounds of the MRISC Breast Cancer Screening Program for Women With a Familial or Genetic Predisposition." Cancer, vol. 106, no. 11, 2006, pp. 2318-26.
Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Cancer. 2006;106(11):2318-26.
Kriege, M., Brekelmans, C. T., Boetes, C., Muller, S. H., Zonderland, H. M., Obdeijn, I. M., Manoliu, R. A., Kok, T., Rutgers, E. J., de Koning, H. J., & Klijn, J. G. (2006). Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Cancer, 106(11), 2318-26.
Kriege M, et al. Differences Between First and Subsequent Rounds of the MRISC Breast Cancer Screening Program for Women With a Familial or Genetic Predisposition. Cancer. 2006 Jun 1;106(11):2318-26. PubMed PMID: 16615112.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. AU - Kriege,Mieke, AU - Brekelmans,Cecile T M, AU - Boetes,Carla, AU - Muller,Sara H, AU - Zonderland,Harmine M, AU - Obdeijn,Inge Marie, AU - Manoliu,Radu A, AU - Kok,Theo, AU - Rutgers,Emiel J T, AU - de Koning,Harry J, AU - Klijn,Jan G M, AU - ,, PY - 2006/4/15/pubmed PY - 2006/7/13/medline PY - 2006/4/15/entrez SP - 2318 EP - 26 JF - Cancer JO - Cancer VL - 106 IS - 11 N2 - BACKGROUND: Within the Dutch MRI Screening (MRISC) study, a Dutch multicenter screening study for hereditary breast cancer, the authors investigated whether previously reported increased diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with mammography would be maintained during subsequent screening rounds. METHODS: From November 1999 to October 2003, 1909 eligible women were included in the study. Screening parameters and tumor characteristics of different rounds were calculated and compared. The authors defined 3 different types of imaging screening rounds: first round in women never screened by imaging before, first round in women screened by imaging (mainly mammography) before, and subsequent rounds. RESULTS: The difference in sensitivity for invasive cancers between mammography and MRI was largest in the first round of women previously screened with mammography (20.0 vs. 93.3%; P=.003), but also in subsequent rounds, there was a significant difference in favor of MRI (29.4 vs. 76.5%; P=.02). The difference in false-positive rate between mammography and MRI was also largest in the first round of women previously screened with mammography (5.5 vs. 14.0%; P<.001), and it remained significant in subsequent rounds (4.6 vs. 8.2%; P<.001). Screen-detected tumors were smaller and more often lymph node negative than symptomatic tumors in age-matched control patients, but no major differences in tumor stage were found between tumors detected at subsequent rounds compared with those in the first round. CONCLUSIONS: In subsequent rounds, a significantly higher sensitivity and better discriminating capacity of MRI compared with mammography was maintained, and a favorable tumor stage compared with age-matched symptomatic controls. As results of these subsequent screening rounds were most predictive for long-term effects, the authors expect that this screening program will contribute to a decrease of breast cancer mortality in these high-risk women. SN - 0008-543X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16615112/Differences_between_first_and_subsequent_rounds_of_the_MRISC_breast_cancer_screening_program_for_women_with_a_familial_or_genetic_predisposition_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21863 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -