Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The adenoma carcinoma sequence: an indoctrinated model for tumorigenesis, but is it always a clinical reality?
Colorectal Dis. 2006 May; 8(4):296-301.CD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evidence exists to support alternative pathways to the adenoma carcinoma sequence. Some mutations in key onco-suppressor genes relate to the anatomical site of the tumour. This link is typified by microsatellite instability and proximal neoplasia. However, rectal tumours are rarely considered separately. We hypothesized that tumour behaviour in the rectum may differ in terms of pathogenesis and malignant propensity. Therefore, we aimed to look for an association between the histopathological features of adenomas and their anatomical location as compared with the distribution of cancers.

METHODS

A single centre prospective study was undertaken over a four-year period. Patients referred to a colorectal assessment clinic with bowel symptoms underwent a minimum investigation of flexible sigmiodoscopy. Neoplastic lesions were either biopsied or removed after noting distance from the anal margin. Adenomas, differentiated by size, villous architecture and degree of dysplasia were compared to both early and advanced carcinomas.

RESULTS

Of 4089 patients, polyps were identified in 8.0% and cancer in 4.2%. There was a clear difference between the distribution of cancer and adenomas > 1 cm, P < 0.001. All degrees of dysplasia in large adenomas were more prevalent in the sigmoid colon as compared to cancer, P < 0.001. Seventy-five percent of high risk diminutive adenomas were rectal in origin.

CONCLUSION

Our data provides indirect evidence to support the concept that a significant proportion of rectal cancers may arise via an alternative pathway to the Vogelstein model. Polyp behaviour along with malignant propensity may actually be site dependent, with rectal polyps harbouring a more aggressive phenotype.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Leighton Hospital, Crewe, UK. darren.smith@mcht.co.ukNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16630233

Citation

Smith, D, et al. "The Adenoma Carcinoma Sequence: an Indoctrinated Model for Tumorigenesis, but Is It Always a Clinical Reality?" Colorectal Disease : the Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 8, no. 4, 2006, pp. 296-301.
Smith D, Ballal M, Hodder R, et al. The adenoma carcinoma sequence: an indoctrinated model for tumorigenesis, but is it always a clinical reality? Colorectal Dis. 2006;8(4):296-301.
Smith, D., Ballal, M., Hodder, R., Selvachandran, S. N., & Cade, D. (2006). The adenoma carcinoma sequence: an indoctrinated model for tumorigenesis, but is it always a clinical reality? Colorectal Disease : the Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 8(4), 296-301.
Smith D, et al. The Adenoma Carcinoma Sequence: an Indoctrinated Model for Tumorigenesis, but Is It Always a Clinical Reality. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8(4):296-301. PubMed PMID: 16630233.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The adenoma carcinoma sequence: an indoctrinated model for tumorigenesis, but is it always a clinical reality? AU - Smith,D, AU - Ballal,M, AU - Hodder,R, AU - Selvachandran,S N, AU - Cade,D, PY - 2006/4/25/pubmed PY - 2006/10/21/medline PY - 2006/4/25/entrez SP - 296 EP - 301 JF - Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland JO - Colorectal Dis VL - 8 IS - 4 N2 - OBJECTIVE: Evidence exists to support alternative pathways to the adenoma carcinoma sequence. Some mutations in key onco-suppressor genes relate to the anatomical site of the tumour. This link is typified by microsatellite instability and proximal neoplasia. However, rectal tumours are rarely considered separately. We hypothesized that tumour behaviour in the rectum may differ in terms of pathogenesis and malignant propensity. Therefore, we aimed to look for an association between the histopathological features of adenomas and their anatomical location as compared with the distribution of cancers. METHODS: A single centre prospective study was undertaken over a four-year period. Patients referred to a colorectal assessment clinic with bowel symptoms underwent a minimum investigation of flexible sigmiodoscopy. Neoplastic lesions were either biopsied or removed after noting distance from the anal margin. Adenomas, differentiated by size, villous architecture and degree of dysplasia were compared to both early and advanced carcinomas. RESULTS: Of 4089 patients, polyps were identified in 8.0% and cancer in 4.2%. There was a clear difference between the distribution of cancer and adenomas > 1 cm, P < 0.001. All degrees of dysplasia in large adenomas were more prevalent in the sigmoid colon as compared to cancer, P < 0.001. Seventy-five percent of high risk diminutive adenomas were rectal in origin. CONCLUSION: Our data provides indirect evidence to support the concept that a significant proportion of rectal cancers may arise via an alternative pathway to the Vogelstein model. Polyp behaviour along with malignant propensity may actually be site dependent, with rectal polyps harbouring a more aggressive phenotype. SN - 1462-8910 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16630233/The_adenoma_carcinoma_sequence:_an_indoctrinated_model_for_tumorigenesis_but_is_it_always_a_clinical_reality DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -