Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Phys Med Biol. 2006 May 21; 51(10):2441-63.PM

Abstract

This paper presents pre-sampling modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) results for an amorphous selenium (a-Se) full field digital mammography system. MTF was calculated from the image of an angled 0.5 mm thick Cu edge, acquired without additional beam filtration. NNPS data were acquired at detector air-kerma levels ranging from 9.1 microGy to 331 microGy, using a standard mammography x-ray spectrum of 28 kV, Mo/Mo target/filter combination and 4 cm of PMMA additional filtration. Prior to NNPS estimation, the image statistics were assessed using a variance image. This method was able to easily identify a detector artefact and should prove useful in routine quality assurance (QA) measurements. Detector DQE, calculated from the NNPS and MTF data, dropped to 0.3 for low detector air-kerma settings but reached an approximately constant value of 0.6 above 50 microGy at the detector. Subjective image quality data were also obtained at these detector air-kerma settings using the CDMAM contrast-detail (c-d) test object. The c-d data reflected the trend seen in DQE, with threshold contrast increasing at low detector air-kerma values. The c-d data were then compared against predictions made using two established models, the Rose model and a standard signal detection theory model. Using DQE(0), the Rose model gave results within approximately 15% on average for all the detector air-kerma values studied and for detail diameters down to 0.2 mm. Similar agreement was also found between the measured c-d data and the signal detection theory results, which were calculated using an ideal human visual response function and a system magnification of unity. The use of full spatial frequency DQE improved the agreement between the calculated and observer results for detail sizes below 0.13 mm.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Clinical Physics Group, Barts and the London NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16675862

Citation

Marshall, N W.. "A Comparison Between Objective and Subjective Image Quality Measurements for a Full Field Digital Mammography System." Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 51, no. 10, 2006, pp. 2441-63.
Marshall NW. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(10):2441-63.
Marshall, N. W. (2006). A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51(10), 2441-63.
Marshall NW. A Comparison Between Objective and Subjective Image Quality Measurements for a Full Field Digital Mammography System. Phys Med Biol. 2006 May 21;51(10):2441-63. PubMed PMID: 16675862.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system. A1 - Marshall,N W, Y1 - 2006/04/26/ PY - 2006/5/6/pubmed PY - 2006/7/28/medline PY - 2006/5/6/entrez SP - 2441 EP - 63 JF - Physics in medicine and biology JO - Phys Med Biol VL - 51 IS - 10 N2 - This paper presents pre-sampling modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) results for an amorphous selenium (a-Se) full field digital mammography system. MTF was calculated from the image of an angled 0.5 mm thick Cu edge, acquired without additional beam filtration. NNPS data were acquired at detector air-kerma levels ranging from 9.1 microGy to 331 microGy, using a standard mammography x-ray spectrum of 28 kV, Mo/Mo target/filter combination and 4 cm of PMMA additional filtration. Prior to NNPS estimation, the image statistics were assessed using a variance image. This method was able to easily identify a detector artefact and should prove useful in routine quality assurance (QA) measurements. Detector DQE, calculated from the NNPS and MTF data, dropped to 0.3 for low detector air-kerma settings but reached an approximately constant value of 0.6 above 50 microGy at the detector. Subjective image quality data were also obtained at these detector air-kerma settings using the CDMAM contrast-detail (c-d) test object. The c-d data reflected the trend seen in DQE, with threshold contrast increasing at low detector air-kerma values. The c-d data were then compared against predictions made using two established models, the Rose model and a standard signal detection theory model. Using DQE(0), the Rose model gave results within approximately 15% on average for all the detector air-kerma values studied and for detail diameters down to 0.2 mm. Similar agreement was also found between the measured c-d data and the signal detection theory results, which were calculated using an ideal human visual response function and a system magnification of unity. The use of full spatial frequency DQE improved the agreement between the calculated and observer results for detail sizes below 0.13 mm. SN - 0031-9155 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16675862/A_comparison_between_objective_and_subjective_image_quality_measurements_for_a_full_field_digital_mammography_system_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -