Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Enteral versus parenteral nutritional support in acute pancreatitis: a clinical review.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Jan; 21(1 Pt 1):22-5.JG

Abstract

A critical analysis of the trials comparing enteral with parenteral nutritional support in acute pancreatitis is presented with particular scrutiny of the clinical endpoints in each trial. The heterogeneity of the trials and the discrepancies in caloric intake between enterally and parenterally fed patients are discussed. The hazards of each route of nutritional support are highlighted and the concept of 'nutritional bioavailability' in the context of acute pancreatitis is introduced. It is concluded that although there is evidence to support enteral feeding as the preferred option, both routes have a role.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Gastroenterology Unit, The Canberra Hospital, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia. andrew.thomson@act.gov.au

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16706807

Citation

Thomson, Andrew. "Enteral Versus Parenteral Nutritional Support in Acute Pancreatitis: a Clinical Review." Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 21, no. 1 Pt 1, 2006, pp. 22-5.
Thomson A. Enteral versus parenteral nutritional support in acute pancreatitis: a clinical review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21(1 Pt 1):22-5.
Thomson, A. (2006). Enteral versus parenteral nutritional support in acute pancreatitis: a clinical review. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 21(1 Pt 1), 22-5.
Thomson A. Enteral Versus Parenteral Nutritional Support in Acute Pancreatitis: a Clinical Review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21(1 Pt 1):22-5. PubMed PMID: 16706807.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Enteral versus parenteral nutritional support in acute pancreatitis: a clinical review. A1 - Thomson,Andrew, PY - 2006/5/19/pubmed PY - 2007/8/7/medline PY - 2006/5/19/entrez SP - 22 EP - 5 JF - Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology JO - J Gastroenterol Hepatol VL - 21 IS - 1 Pt 1 N2 - A critical analysis of the trials comparing enteral with parenteral nutritional support in acute pancreatitis is presented with particular scrutiny of the clinical endpoints in each trial. The heterogeneity of the trials and the discrepancies in caloric intake between enterally and parenterally fed patients are discussed. The hazards of each route of nutritional support are highlighted and the concept of 'nutritional bioavailability' in the context of acute pancreatitis is introduced. It is concluded that although there is evidence to support enteral feeding as the preferred option, both routes have a role. SN - 0815-9319 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16706807/Enteral_versus_parenteral_nutritional_support_in_acute_pancreatitis:_a_clinical_review_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.04121.x DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -