Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Emergency nurse practitioner care and emergency department patient flow: case-control study.
Emerg Med Australas. 2006 Aug; 18(4):385-90.EM

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to compare ED waiting times (for medical assessment and treatment), treatment times and length of stay (LOS) for patients managed by an emergency nurse practitioner candidate (ENPC) with patients managed via traditional ED care.

METHODS

A case-control design was used. Patients were selected using the three most common ED discharge diagnoses for ENPC managed patients: hand/wrist wounds, hand/wrist fractures and removal of plaster of Paris. The ENPC group (n = 102) consisted of patients managed by the ENPC who had ED discharge diagnoses as mentioned above. The control group (n = 623) consisted of patients with the same ED discharge diagnoses who were managed via traditional ED care.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in median waiting times, treatment times and ED LOS between ENPC managed patients and patients managed via traditional ED processes. There appeared to be some variability between diagnostic subgroups in terms of treatment times and ED LOS.

CONCLUSION

Patient flow outcomes for ENPC managed patients are comparable with those of patients managed via usual ED processes.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Emergency Department, The Northern Hospital, Epping, Victoria, Australia. julie.considine@nh.org.auNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16842309

Citation

Considine, Julie, et al. "Emergency Nurse Practitioner Care and Emergency Department Patient Flow: Case-control Study." Emergency Medicine Australasia : EMA, vol. 18, no. 4, 2006, pp. 385-90.
Considine J, Martin R, Smit D, et al. Emergency nurse practitioner care and emergency department patient flow: case-control study. Emerg Med Australas. 2006;18(4):385-90.
Considine, J., Martin, R., Smit, D., Winter, C., & Jenkins, J. (2006). Emergency nurse practitioner care and emergency department patient flow: case-control study. Emergency Medicine Australasia : EMA, 18(4), 385-90.
Considine J, et al. Emergency Nurse Practitioner Care and Emergency Department Patient Flow: Case-control Study. Emerg Med Australas. 2006;18(4):385-90. PubMed PMID: 16842309.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Emergency nurse practitioner care and emergency department patient flow: case-control study. AU - Considine,Julie, AU - Martin,Roslyn, AU - Smit,DeVilliers, AU - Winter,Craig, AU - Jenkins,Jane, PY - 2006/7/18/pubmed PY - 2006/12/9/medline PY - 2006/7/18/entrez SP - 385 EP - 90 JF - Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA JO - Emerg Med Australas VL - 18 IS - 4 N2 - OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to compare ED waiting times (for medical assessment and treatment), treatment times and length of stay (LOS) for patients managed by an emergency nurse practitioner candidate (ENPC) with patients managed via traditional ED care. METHODS: A case-control design was used. Patients were selected using the three most common ED discharge diagnoses for ENPC managed patients: hand/wrist wounds, hand/wrist fractures and removal of plaster of Paris. The ENPC group (n = 102) consisted of patients managed by the ENPC who had ED discharge diagnoses as mentioned above. The control group (n = 623) consisted of patients with the same ED discharge diagnoses who were managed via traditional ED care. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in median waiting times, treatment times and ED LOS between ENPC managed patients and patients managed via traditional ED processes. There appeared to be some variability between diagnostic subgroups in terms of treatment times and ED LOS. CONCLUSION: Patient flow outcomes for ENPC managed patients are comparable with those of patients managed via usual ED processes. SN - 1742-6731 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16842309/Emergency_nurse_practitioner_care_and_emergency_department_patient_flow:_case_control_study_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00870.x DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -