Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Tutor training, evaluation criteria and teaching environment influence students' ratings of tutor feedback in problem-based learning.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 Nov; 12(4):427-39.AH

Abstract

AIM

In a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum, tutor's feedback skills are important. However, evaluation studies often show that students rate many tutors as ineffective in providing feedback. We explored whether this is related: (a) to tutors' skills, and hence a teaching intervention might improve their performance; (b) to the formulation of the evaluation item, hence a more specific wording might help students better recognize a feedback when received; (c) to PBL teaching environment, and hence the tutors' teaching unit might influence students' ratings.

METHODS

Students rated 126 tutors of 13 one-month teaching units over three consecutive years on their ability of providing feedback. We assessed how (a) a teaching intervention given between years 1 and 2, (b) a rewording of the evaluation item which took place in year 3, and (c) the tutors' teaching unit, influenced students' ratings.

RESULTS

The ratings of tutors considered as effective by students at year 1 improved after the teaching intervention, while those of unsatisfactory tutors did not progress. However the ratings of the latter increased after reformulation of the evaluation item. This increase varied across teaching units.

DISCUSSION

Students' ratings of tutors' ability to give feedback seem to vary in function of the tutors' training, of the formulation of the evaluation item, and of the tutors' teaching environment. These variables should be considered for setting up effective strategies in faculty development.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Faculty of Medicine, Unit of Development and Research in Medical Education, University of Geneva, 1 rue Michel Servet, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland. anne.baroffiobarbier@medecine.unige.chNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16847731

Citation

Baroffio, Anne, et al. "Tutor Training, Evaluation Criteria and Teaching Environment Influence Students' Ratings of Tutor Feedback in Problem-based Learning." Advances in Health Sciences Education : Theory and Practice, vol. 12, no. 4, 2007, pp. 427-39.
Baroffio A, Nendaz MR, Perrier A, et al. Tutor training, evaluation criteria and teaching environment influence students' ratings of tutor feedback in problem-based learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007;12(4):427-39.
Baroffio, A., Nendaz, M. R., Perrier, A., & Vu, N. V. (2007). Tutor training, evaluation criteria and teaching environment influence students' ratings of tutor feedback in problem-based learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education : Theory and Practice, 12(4), 427-39.
Baroffio A, et al. Tutor Training, Evaluation Criteria and Teaching Environment Influence Students' Ratings of Tutor Feedback in Problem-based Learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007;12(4):427-39. PubMed PMID: 16847731.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Tutor training, evaluation criteria and teaching environment influence students' ratings of tutor feedback in problem-based learning. AU - Baroffio,Anne, AU - Nendaz,Mathieu R, AU - Perrier,Arnaud, AU - Vu,Nu V, Y1 - 2006/07/18/ PY - 2005/10/21/received PY - 2006/03/29/accepted PY - 2006/7/19/pubmed PY - 2007/12/12/medline PY - 2006/7/19/entrez SP - 427 EP - 39 JF - Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice JO - Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract VL - 12 IS - 4 N2 - AIM: In a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum, tutor's feedback skills are important. However, evaluation studies often show that students rate many tutors as ineffective in providing feedback. We explored whether this is related: (a) to tutors' skills, and hence a teaching intervention might improve their performance; (b) to the formulation of the evaluation item, hence a more specific wording might help students better recognize a feedback when received; (c) to PBL teaching environment, and hence the tutors' teaching unit might influence students' ratings. METHODS: Students rated 126 tutors of 13 one-month teaching units over three consecutive years on their ability of providing feedback. We assessed how (a) a teaching intervention given between years 1 and 2, (b) a rewording of the evaluation item which took place in year 3, and (c) the tutors' teaching unit, influenced students' ratings. RESULTS: The ratings of tutors considered as effective by students at year 1 improved after the teaching intervention, while those of unsatisfactory tutors did not progress. However the ratings of the latter increased after reformulation of the evaluation item. This increase varied across teaching units. DISCUSSION: Students' ratings of tutors' ability to give feedback seem to vary in function of the tutors' training, of the formulation of the evaluation item, and of the tutors' teaching environment. These variables should be considered for setting up effective strategies in faculty development. SN - 1382-4996 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16847731/Tutor_training_evaluation_criteria_and_teaching_environment_influence_students'_ratings_of_tutor_feedback_in_problem_based_learning_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -