Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Is self-monitoring of blood glucose appropriate for all type 2 diabetic patients? The Fremantle Diabetes Study.
Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug; 29(8):1764-70.DC

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is associated with better glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used cross-sectional and longitudinal data from type 2 diabetic participants in the observational, community-based Fremantle Diabetes Study (FDS) who reported SMBG status at study entry (n = 1,286) and annual reviews over 5 years (n = 531).

RESULTS

At study entry, 70% of patients performed SMBG, with a median of four tests per week (interquartile range two to seven). Patients with shorter diabetes duration; who were attending diabetes education, diabetes-related clinics, or medical specialists; who were taking insulin with or without oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs); and who were self-reporting hypoglycemic events were more likely to use SMBG. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal FDS data showed that HbA(1c) (A1C) was not significantly different between SMBG users and nonusers, either overall or within diabetes treatment groups (diet, OHAs, and insulin with or without OHAs). There was also no independent cross-sectional relationship between A1C and SMBG frequency. The average annual societal cost of using SMBG (in year 2000 Australian dollars [Adollars], excluding glucometers) was 162 Australian dollars per type 2 diabetic patient or 51 million Australian dollars when projected to the Australian diagnosed type 2 diabetic population.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither SMBG testing nor its frequency was associated with glycemic benefit in type 2 diabetic patients regardless of treatment. Our data did not include methods of SMBG delivery and application, factors that require further assessment in the evaluation of SMBG utility in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. SMBG may be still of value in the identification and prevention of hypoglycemia and in dose adjustment in insulin-treated patients.

Authors+Show Affiliations

School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Fremantle Hospital. wdavis@cyllene.uwa.edu.auNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

16873777

Citation

Davis, Wendy A., et al. "Is Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose Appropriate for All Type 2 Diabetic Patients? the Fremantle Diabetes Study." Diabetes Care, vol. 29, no. 8, 2006, pp. 1764-70.
Davis WA, Bruce DG, Davis TM. Is self-monitoring of blood glucose appropriate for all type 2 diabetic patients? The Fremantle Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(8):1764-70.
Davis, W. A., Bruce, D. G., & Davis, T. M. (2006). Is self-monitoring of blood glucose appropriate for all type 2 diabetic patients? The Fremantle Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care, 29(8), 1764-70.
Davis WA, Bruce DG, Davis TM. Is Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose Appropriate for All Type 2 Diabetic Patients? the Fremantle Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(8):1764-70. PubMed PMID: 16873777.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Is self-monitoring of blood glucose appropriate for all type 2 diabetic patients? The Fremantle Diabetes Study. AU - Davis,Wendy A, AU - Bruce,David G, AU - Davis,Timothy M E, PY - 2006/7/29/pubmed PY - 2006/12/9/medline PY - 2006/7/29/entrez SP - 1764 EP - 70 JF - Diabetes care JO - Diabetes Care VL - 29 IS - 8 N2 - OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is associated with better glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used cross-sectional and longitudinal data from type 2 diabetic participants in the observational, community-based Fremantle Diabetes Study (FDS) who reported SMBG status at study entry (n = 1,286) and annual reviews over 5 years (n = 531). RESULTS: At study entry, 70% of patients performed SMBG, with a median of four tests per week (interquartile range two to seven). Patients with shorter diabetes duration; who were attending diabetes education, diabetes-related clinics, or medical specialists; who were taking insulin with or without oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs); and who were self-reporting hypoglycemic events were more likely to use SMBG. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal FDS data showed that HbA(1c) (A1C) was not significantly different between SMBG users and nonusers, either overall or within diabetes treatment groups (diet, OHAs, and insulin with or without OHAs). There was also no independent cross-sectional relationship between A1C and SMBG frequency. The average annual societal cost of using SMBG (in year 2000 Australian dollars [Adollars], excluding glucometers) was 162 Australian dollars per type 2 diabetic patient or 51 million Australian dollars when projected to the Australian diagnosed type 2 diabetic population. CONCLUSIONS: Neither SMBG testing nor its frequency was associated with glycemic benefit in type 2 diabetic patients regardless of treatment. Our data did not include methods of SMBG delivery and application, factors that require further assessment in the evaluation of SMBG utility in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. SMBG may be still of value in the identification and prevention of hypoglycemia and in dose adjustment in insulin-treated patients. SN - 0149-5992 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16873777/Is_self_monitoring_of_blood_glucose_appropriate_for_all_type_2_diabetic_patients_The_Fremantle_Diabetes_Study_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -