Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Posterior capsule opacification after implantation of a hydrophilic or a hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens: one-year follow-up.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Oct; 32(10):1627-31.JC

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of hydrophilic and hydrophobic single-piece acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) on posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after cataract surgery.

SETTING

St. Erik's Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

METHODS

In a prospective study, 120 patients having cataract surgery were randomized to implantation of a hydrophilic acrylic IOL (BL27, Bausch & Lomb) or a hydrophobic acrylic IOL (AcrySof SA60AT, Alcon). Surgery was performed according to a standardized protocol by 1 of 3 surgeons. Best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, glare, intraocular pressure, and flare were measured 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery. Posterior capsule opacification was assessed by digital retroillumination photography and analysis using POCOman software at 1 year. The rate of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy for each IOL was also recorded.

RESULTS

At 1 year, the hydrophilic acrylic IOL group had a significantly greater percentage area and severity of PCO than the hydrophobic acrylic IOL group (P<.001). Two patients in the hydrophilic acrylic IOL group and 4 in the hydrophobic acrylic IOL group had an Nd:YAG capsulotomy within the first year (P>.05). Contrast sensitivity was significantly better in the hydrophilic acrylic group at 3 months (P<.05); however, at 12 months no difference between the IOLs was observed. There was no significant difference in the other measured parameters.

CONCLUSION

Patients with the hydrophilic acrylic BL27 IOL had a significantly greater percentage area and severity of PCO than those with the hydrophobic acrylic SA60AT IOL 1 year after surgery.

Authors+Show Affiliations

St Erik's Eye Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. m.kugelberg@sankterik.seNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

17010858

Citation

Kugelberg, Maria, et al. "Posterior Capsule Opacification After Implantation of a Hydrophilic or a Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens: One-year Follow-up." Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 10, 2006, pp. 1627-31.
Kugelberg M, Wejde G, Jayaram H, et al. Posterior capsule opacification after implantation of a hydrophilic or a hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens: one-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(10):1627-31.
Kugelberg, M., Wejde, G., Jayaram, H., & Zetterström, C. (2006). Posterior capsule opacification after implantation of a hydrophilic or a hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens: one-year follow-up. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 32(10), 1627-31.
Kugelberg M, et al. Posterior Capsule Opacification After Implantation of a Hydrophilic or a Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens: One-year Follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(10):1627-31. PubMed PMID: 17010858.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Posterior capsule opacification after implantation of a hydrophilic or a hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens: one-year follow-up. AU - Kugelberg,Maria, AU - Wejde,Gisela, AU - Jayaram,Hari, AU - Zetterström,Charlotta, PY - 2006/04/11/received PY - 2006/05/21/accepted PY - 2006/10/3/pubmed PY - 2006/11/11/medline PY - 2006/10/3/entrez SP - 1627 EP - 31 JF - Journal of cataract and refractive surgery JO - J Cataract Refract Surg VL - 32 IS - 10 N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of hydrophilic and hydrophobic single-piece acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) on posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after cataract surgery. SETTING: St. Erik's Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. METHODS: In a prospective study, 120 patients having cataract surgery were randomized to implantation of a hydrophilic acrylic IOL (BL27, Bausch & Lomb) or a hydrophobic acrylic IOL (AcrySof SA60AT, Alcon). Surgery was performed according to a standardized protocol by 1 of 3 surgeons. Best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, glare, intraocular pressure, and flare were measured 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery. Posterior capsule opacification was assessed by digital retroillumination photography and analysis using POCOman software at 1 year. The rate of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy for each IOL was also recorded. RESULTS: At 1 year, the hydrophilic acrylic IOL group had a significantly greater percentage area and severity of PCO than the hydrophobic acrylic IOL group (P<.001). Two patients in the hydrophilic acrylic IOL group and 4 in the hydrophobic acrylic IOL group had an Nd:YAG capsulotomy within the first year (P>.05). Contrast sensitivity was significantly better in the hydrophilic acrylic group at 3 months (P<.05); however, at 12 months no difference between the IOLs was observed. There was no significant difference in the other measured parameters. CONCLUSION: Patients with the hydrophilic acrylic BL27 IOL had a significantly greater percentage area and severity of PCO than those with the hydrophobic acrylic SA60AT IOL 1 year after surgery. SN - 0886-3350 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/17010858/Posterior_capsule_opacification_after_implantation_of_a_hydrophilic_or_a_hydrophobic_acrylic_intraocular_lens:_one_year_follow_up_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0886-3350(06)00878-9 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -