Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparative binding energy analysis considering multiple receptors: a step toward 3D-QSAR models for multiple targets.
J Med Chem. 2006 Oct 19; 49(21):6241-53.JM

Abstract

Comparative binding energy analysis, a technique to derive receptor-based three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships (3D-QSAR), is herein extended to consider both affinity and selectivity in the derivation of the QSAR model. The extension is based on allowing multiple structurally related receptors to enter the X-matrix employed in the derivation of the structure-activity model. As a result, a single model common to all of them is obtained that considers both intra- and inter-receptor affinity differences for a given congeneric series. We applied the technique to a series of 88 3-amidinophenylalanines, binding to thrombin, trypsin, and factor Xa (fXa). A single predictive regression model for the three receptors involving 202 complexes, with a leave-one out (LOO) cross-validated Q(2) of 0.689, was obtained, and selectivity requirements were investigated. We find that total or partial occupancy of any of the three main pockets in the binding site (D-site, P-site, and the rim of the S1-site) leads to higher affinity across the family. However, the fact that thrombin can make stronger interactions in the P-site, as a result of its exclusive 60-loop, makes of this site a specificity pocket for this thrombin. Occupancy of the D-site leads to more active inhibitors toward fXa for the same reason, but the model does not highlight strongly the D-box because inhibitors are too short to fully occupy it. Negative charge density in the neighborhood of position 88 (a Lys insertion in thrombin) is found to be a determinant for thrombin recognition. These results were consistent with previous studies on selectivity in the thrombin/trypsin/fXa system.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, P.O. Box 1218, New York, New York 10029, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

17034130

Citation

Murcia, Marta, et al. "Comparative Binding Energy Analysis Considering Multiple Receptors: a Step Toward 3D-QSAR Models for Multiple Targets." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 21, 2006, pp. 6241-53.
Murcia M, Morreale A, Ortiz AR. Comparative binding energy analysis considering multiple receptors: a step toward 3D-QSAR models for multiple targets. J Med Chem. 2006;49(21):6241-53.
Murcia, M., Morreale, A., & Ortiz, A. R. (2006). Comparative binding energy analysis considering multiple receptors: a step toward 3D-QSAR models for multiple targets. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 49(21), 6241-53.
Murcia M, Morreale A, Ortiz AR. Comparative Binding Energy Analysis Considering Multiple Receptors: a Step Toward 3D-QSAR Models for Multiple Targets. J Med Chem. 2006 Oct 19;49(21):6241-53. PubMed PMID: 17034130.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative binding energy analysis considering multiple receptors: a step toward 3D-QSAR models for multiple targets. AU - Murcia,Marta, AU - Morreale,Antonio, AU - Ortiz,Angel R, PY - 2006/10/13/pubmed PY - 2006/12/9/medline PY - 2006/10/13/entrez SP - 6241 EP - 53 JF - Journal of medicinal chemistry JO - J Med Chem VL - 49 IS - 21 N2 - Comparative binding energy analysis, a technique to derive receptor-based three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships (3D-QSAR), is herein extended to consider both affinity and selectivity in the derivation of the QSAR model. The extension is based on allowing multiple structurally related receptors to enter the X-matrix employed in the derivation of the structure-activity model. As a result, a single model common to all of them is obtained that considers both intra- and inter-receptor affinity differences for a given congeneric series. We applied the technique to a series of 88 3-amidinophenylalanines, binding to thrombin, trypsin, and factor Xa (fXa). A single predictive regression model for the three receptors involving 202 complexes, with a leave-one out (LOO) cross-validated Q(2) of 0.689, was obtained, and selectivity requirements were investigated. We find that total or partial occupancy of any of the three main pockets in the binding site (D-site, P-site, and the rim of the S1-site) leads to higher affinity across the family. However, the fact that thrombin can make stronger interactions in the P-site, as a result of its exclusive 60-loop, makes of this site a specificity pocket for this thrombin. Occupancy of the D-site leads to more active inhibitors toward fXa for the same reason, but the model does not highlight strongly the D-box because inhibitors are too short to fully occupy it. Negative charge density in the neighborhood of position 88 (a Lys insertion in thrombin) is found to be a determinant for thrombin recognition. These results were consistent with previous studies on selectivity in the thrombin/trypsin/fXa system. SN - 0022-2623 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/17034130/Comparative_binding_energy_analysis_considering_multiple_receptors:_a_step_toward_3D_QSAR_models_for_multiple_targets_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1021/jm060350h DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -