Exercise for women receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (4):CD005001CD
A huge clinical research database on adjuvant cancer treatment has verified improvements in breast cancer outcomes such as recurrence and mortality rates. On the other hand, adjuvant therapy with agents such as hormone therapy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy impacts on quality of life due to substantial short- and long-term side effects.
To assess the effect of aerobic or resistance exercise interventions during adjuvant treatment for breast cancer on treatment-related side effects such as physical deterioration, fatigue, psychosocial distress and physiological, morphological and biological changes.
We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Specialised Register (16 July 2004) and the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (1966 to 2006), EMBASE (1988 to 2004), CINAHL (1982 to 2004), SPORTDiscus (1975 to 2004), PsycINFO (1872 to 2003), SIGLE (1880 to 2004), ProQuest Digital Dissertations (1861 to 2004) and Conference Papers Index (1973 to 2004). Furthermore, we screened references in relevant reviews and clinical trials and handsearched relevant journals.
We included randomised and non-randomised controlled trials that examined aerobic or resistance exercise, or both, in women undergoing adjuvant treatment for breast cancer.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality and adequacy of the training stimulus following a set of standardised criteria. Meta-analyses were performed for physical fitness, fatigue and weight gain using a random-effects model.
Nine trials involving 452 women met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis for cardiorespiratory fitness (involving 207 participants) suggested that exercise improves cardiorespiratory fitness (SMD 0.66, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.12). Meta-analysis for fatigue (317 participants) found statistically non-significant improvements for participants in the exercise intervention groups compared to control (non-exercising) groups (SMD -0.12, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.13); the same applied for the meta-analysis of weight gain (147 participants) (SMD -1.11, 95% CI -2.44 to 0.22). Evidence for other outcomes remains limited. Adverse effects (lymphedema and shoulder tendonitis) were observed in two trials. The results from non-randomised controlled trials are similar to those of randomised controlled trials and do not appear to produce any bias. This review is based on a small number of trials with a considerable degree of clinical heterogeneity regarding adjuvant cancer treatments and exercise interventions.