Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Fuzzy Markov random fields versus chains for multispectral image segmentation.
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2006 Nov; 28(11):1753-67.IT

Abstract

This paper deals with a comparison of recent statistical models based on fuzzy Markov random fields and chains for multispectral image segmentation. The fuzzy scheme takes into account discrete and continuous classes which model the imprecision of the hidden data. In this framework, we assume the dependence between bands and we express the general model for the covariance matrix. A fuzzy Markov chain model is developed in an unsupervised way. This method is compared with the fuzzy Markovian field model previously proposed by one of the authors. The segmentation task is processed with Bayesian tools, such as the well-known MPM (Mode of Posterior Marginals) criterion. Our goal is to compare the robustness and rapidity for both methods (fuzzy Markov fields versus fuzzy Markov chains). Indeed, such fuzzy-based procedures seem to be a good answer, e.g., for astronomical observations when the patterns present diffuse structures. Moreover, these approaches allow us to process missing data in one or several spectral bands which correspond to specific situations in astronomy. To validate both models, we perform and compare the segmentation on synthetic images and raw multispectral astronomical data.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Laboratoire InESS, Institut d'Electronique du Solide et des Systmes, Strasbourg, France. salzenst@iness.c-strasbourg.frNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

17063681

Citation

Salzenstein, Fabien, and Christophe Collet. "Fuzzy Markov Random Fields Versus Chains for Multispectral Image Segmentation." IEEE Transactions On Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 28, no. 11, 2006, pp. 1753-67.
Salzenstein F, Collet C. Fuzzy Markov random fields versus chains for multispectral image segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2006;28(11):1753-67.
Salzenstein, F., & Collet, C. (2006). Fuzzy Markov random fields versus chains for multispectral image segmentation. IEEE Transactions On Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(11), 1753-67.
Salzenstein F, Collet C. Fuzzy Markov Random Fields Versus Chains for Multispectral Image Segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2006;28(11):1753-67. PubMed PMID: 17063681.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Fuzzy Markov random fields versus chains for multispectral image segmentation. AU - Salzenstein,Fabien, AU - Collet,Christophe, PY - 2006/10/27/pubmed PY - 2006/12/9/medline PY - 2006/10/27/entrez SP - 1753 EP - 67 JF - IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence JO - IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell VL - 28 IS - 11 N2 - This paper deals with a comparison of recent statistical models based on fuzzy Markov random fields and chains for multispectral image segmentation. The fuzzy scheme takes into account discrete and continuous classes which model the imprecision of the hidden data. In this framework, we assume the dependence between bands and we express the general model for the covariance matrix. A fuzzy Markov chain model is developed in an unsupervised way. This method is compared with the fuzzy Markovian field model previously proposed by one of the authors. The segmentation task is processed with Bayesian tools, such as the well-known MPM (Mode of Posterior Marginals) criterion. Our goal is to compare the robustness and rapidity for both methods (fuzzy Markov fields versus fuzzy Markov chains). Indeed, such fuzzy-based procedures seem to be a good answer, e.g., for astronomical observations when the patterns present diffuse structures. Moreover, these approaches allow us to process missing data in one or several spectral bands which correspond to specific situations in astronomy. To validate both models, we perform and compare the segmentation on synthetic images and raw multispectral astronomical data. SN - 0162-8828 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/17063681/Fuzzy_Markov_random_fields_versus_chains_for_multispectral_image_segmentation_ L2 - https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2006.228 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -