Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Pilot mental workload: how well do pilots really perform?
Ergonomics. 2006 Dec 15; 49(15):1581-96.E

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of increasing mental demands on various aspects of aircrew performance. In particular, the robustness of the prioritization and allocation hierarchy of aviate-navigate-communicate was examined, a hierarchy commonly used within the aviation industry. A total of 42 trainee pilots were divided into three workload groups (low, medium, high) to complete a desktop, computer-based exercise that simulated combinations of generic flight deck activities: flight control manipulation, rule-based actions and higher level cognitive processing, in addition to Air Traffic Control instructions that varied in length from one chunk of auditory information to seven chunks. It was found that as mental workload and auditory input increased, participants experienced considerable difficulty in carrying out the primary manipulation task. A similar decline in prioritization was also observed. Moreover, when pilots were under a high mental workload their ability to comprehend more than two chunks of auditory data deteriorated rapidly.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, 3122 Victoria, Australia.No affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

17090505

Citation

Morris, Charles H., and Ying K. Leung. "Pilot Mental Workload: How Well Do Pilots Really Perform?" Ergonomics, vol. 49, no. 15, 2006, pp. 1581-96.
Morris CH, Leung YK. Pilot mental workload: how well do pilots really perform? Ergonomics. 2006;49(15):1581-96.
Morris, C. H., & Leung, Y. K. (2006). Pilot mental workload: how well do pilots really perform? Ergonomics, 49(15), 1581-96.
Morris CH, Leung YK. Pilot Mental Workload: How Well Do Pilots Really Perform. Ergonomics. 2006 Dec 15;49(15):1581-96. PubMed PMID: 17090505.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Pilot mental workload: how well do pilots really perform? AU - Morris,Charles H, AU - Leung,Ying K, PY - 2006/11/9/pubmed PY - 2007/2/16/medline PY - 2006/11/9/entrez SP - 1581 EP - 96 JF - Ergonomics JO - Ergonomics VL - 49 IS - 15 N2 - The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of increasing mental demands on various aspects of aircrew performance. In particular, the robustness of the prioritization and allocation hierarchy of aviate-navigate-communicate was examined, a hierarchy commonly used within the aviation industry. A total of 42 trainee pilots were divided into three workload groups (low, medium, high) to complete a desktop, computer-based exercise that simulated combinations of generic flight deck activities: flight control manipulation, rule-based actions and higher level cognitive processing, in addition to Air Traffic Control instructions that varied in length from one chunk of auditory information to seven chunks. It was found that as mental workload and auditory input increased, participants experienced considerable difficulty in carrying out the primary manipulation task. A similar decline in prioritization was also observed. Moreover, when pilots were under a high mental workload their ability to comprehend more than two chunks of auditory data deteriorated rapidly. SN - 0014-0139 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/17090505/Pilot_mental_workload:_how_well_do_pilots_really_perform L2 - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00140130600857987 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -