Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Sensitivity and specificity of an antigen detection ELISA for malaria diagnosis.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Dec; 75(6):1205-8.AJ

Abstract

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) allow for the testing of large numbers of samples within a short time frame. We tested the sensitivity and specificity of a histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)-based, commercially available ELISA antigen detection assay for Plasmodium falciparum (Malaria Antigen CELISA; Cellabs, Sydney, Australia). A total of 700 whole blood samples obtained from symptomatic outpatients of malaria clinics along the Thai-Myanmar border were tested relative to blinded duplicate expert microscopy adjusted with species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR-adjusted microscopy showed that 79 (11.3%) were infected with P. falciparum, 118 (16.9%) with P. vivax, 1 (0.1%) with P. malariae, 7 (1.0%) with mixed infections (P. falciparum and P. vivax), and 495 (70.7%) were negative. The geometric mean parasite density for P. falciparum was 7547/muL (range: 12-363,810/muL). The overall sensitivity of the HRP2 ELISA for P. falciparum malaria was 98.8% (95% CI, 93.6-100%) and the specificity was 100% (95% CI, 99.5-100%). The positive and negative predictive values for the ELISA were 100% (95% CI, 96.5-100%) and 99.8% (95% CI, 99.1-100%), respectively. The results for P. falciparum were clearly superior to expert microscopy alone, particularly in mixed infections. Microscopy combined with ELISA reaches a sensitivity and specificity similar to PCR-adjusted microscopy for the diagnosis of P. falciparum while being considerably less expensive and faster. We conclude that ELISA serves as an excellent tool to augment microscopy as the gold standard for P. falciparum diagnosis in research settings and should be further evaluated for screening in blood banks.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Immunology and Medicine, USAMC-AFRIMS, Bangkok, Thailand. harald.noedl@meduniwien.ac.atNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

17172394

Citation

Noedl, Harald, et al. "Sensitivity and Specificity of an Antigen Detection ELISA for Malaria Diagnosis." The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 75, no. 6, 2006, pp. 1205-8.
Noedl H, Yingyuen K, Laoboonchai A, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of an antigen detection ELISA for malaria diagnosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75(6):1205-8.
Noedl, H., Yingyuen, K., Laoboonchai, A., Fukuda, M., Sirichaisinthop, J., & Miller, R. S. (2006). Sensitivity and specificity of an antigen detection ELISA for malaria diagnosis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 75(6), 1205-8.
Noedl H, et al. Sensitivity and Specificity of an Antigen Detection ELISA for Malaria Diagnosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75(6):1205-8. PubMed PMID: 17172394.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Sensitivity and specificity of an antigen detection ELISA for malaria diagnosis. AU - Noedl,Harald, AU - Yingyuen,Kritsanai, AU - Laoboonchai,Anintita, AU - Fukuda,Mark, AU - Sirichaisinthop,Jeeraphat, AU - Miller,R Scott, PY - 2006/12/19/pubmed PY - 2007/4/5/medline PY - 2006/12/19/entrez SP - 1205 EP - 8 JF - The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene JO - Am J Trop Med Hyg VL - 75 IS - 6 N2 - Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) allow for the testing of large numbers of samples within a short time frame. We tested the sensitivity and specificity of a histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)-based, commercially available ELISA antigen detection assay for Plasmodium falciparum (Malaria Antigen CELISA; Cellabs, Sydney, Australia). A total of 700 whole blood samples obtained from symptomatic outpatients of malaria clinics along the Thai-Myanmar border were tested relative to blinded duplicate expert microscopy adjusted with species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR-adjusted microscopy showed that 79 (11.3%) were infected with P. falciparum, 118 (16.9%) with P. vivax, 1 (0.1%) with P. malariae, 7 (1.0%) with mixed infections (P. falciparum and P. vivax), and 495 (70.7%) were negative. The geometric mean parasite density for P. falciparum was 7547/muL (range: 12-363,810/muL). The overall sensitivity of the HRP2 ELISA for P. falciparum malaria was 98.8% (95% CI, 93.6-100%) and the specificity was 100% (95% CI, 99.5-100%). The positive and negative predictive values for the ELISA were 100% (95% CI, 96.5-100%) and 99.8% (95% CI, 99.1-100%), respectively. The results for P. falciparum were clearly superior to expert microscopy alone, particularly in mixed infections. Microscopy combined with ELISA reaches a sensitivity and specificity similar to PCR-adjusted microscopy for the diagnosis of P. falciparum while being considerably less expensive and faster. We conclude that ELISA serves as an excellent tool to augment microscopy as the gold standard for P. falciparum diagnosis in research settings and should be further evaluated for screening in blood banks. SN - 0002-9637 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/17172394/Sensitivity_and_specificity_of_an_antigen_detection_ELISA_for_malaria_diagnosis_ L2 - http://www.diseaseinfosearch.org/result/4415 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -