Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

[Resting energy expenditure measured vs. estimated and this relationship with body composition in women].
Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2006; 50(6):1050-8AB

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the resting energy expenditure (REE, kcal/d) measured to the disposable equation of literature and to associate this to body composition.

METHODS

Twenty-eight sedentary women were volunteers [weight: 79 +/- 12 kg; stature: 164 +/- 5 cm; age: 36 +/- 11 years; body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)): 29 +/- 4]. The body composition was estimated with anthropometry methods; REE was measured by indirect calorimetry and was estimated by the main equations of the literature. Equations were developed to estimate REE and the best of them was REE-Our.

RESULTS

The different time of harvest produced a similar result to REE measured. The Harris and Benedict, FAO/WHO/UNO only weight, and weight plus height, Schofield and REE-Our equations results were statistically similar to REE measured. The Siervo and Falconi, Schofield and Henry and Rees equations did not have correlation with the measured calorimetry. The best-isolated predictor of the REE was the body mass and the best association when adjusted to unit (kg) was lean body mass. The equation developed in the present work was: REE(kcal/d)= 21837 - 14,448 * Weight(kg) + 54,963 * Lean Mass(kg)--9,341 * Stature(cm)--4,349 * Age(years)--19753 * Body Density(g/ml).

CONCLUSION

The REE prediction equations can prompt to errors and seem to be population specific. The best prediction result was with the equation developed with anthropometrics variables of the volunteers (measured= 1617 +/- 237 kcal/d; REE-Our= 1616 +/- 167 kcal/d).

Authors+Show Affiliations

Faculdade de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT. cafett@hotmail.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article

Language

por

PubMed ID

17221111

Citation

Fett, Carlos A., et al. "[Resting Energy Expenditure Measured Vs. Estimated and This Relationship With Body Composition in Women]." Arquivos Brasileiros De Endocrinologia E Metabologia, vol. 50, no. 6, 2006, pp. 1050-8.
Fett CA, Fett WC, Marchini JS. [Resting energy expenditure measured vs. estimated and this relationship with body composition in women]. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2006;50(6):1050-8.
Fett, C. A., Fett, W. C., & Marchini, J. S. (2006). [Resting energy expenditure measured vs. estimated and this relationship with body composition in women]. Arquivos Brasileiros De Endocrinologia E Metabologia, 50(6), pp. 1050-8.
Fett CA, Fett WC, Marchini JS. [Resting Energy Expenditure Measured Vs. Estimated and This Relationship With Body Composition in Women]. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2006;50(6):1050-8. PubMed PMID: 17221111.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - [Resting energy expenditure measured vs. estimated and this relationship with body composition in women]. AU - Fett,Carlos A, AU - Fett,Waléria C R, AU - Marchini,Julio S, PY - 2006/01/31/received PY - 2006/07/10/accepted PY - 2007/1/16/pubmed PY - 2008/2/22/medline PY - 2007/1/16/entrez SP - 1050 EP - 8 JF - Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia JO - Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol VL - 50 IS - 6 N2 - OBJECTIVES: To compare the resting energy expenditure (REE, kcal/d) measured to the disposable equation of literature and to associate this to body composition. METHODS: Twenty-eight sedentary women were volunteers [weight: 79 +/- 12 kg; stature: 164 +/- 5 cm; age: 36 +/- 11 years; body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)): 29 +/- 4]. The body composition was estimated with anthropometry methods; REE was measured by indirect calorimetry and was estimated by the main equations of the literature. Equations were developed to estimate REE and the best of them was REE-Our. RESULTS: The different time of harvest produced a similar result to REE measured. The Harris and Benedict, FAO/WHO/UNO only weight, and weight plus height, Schofield and REE-Our equations results were statistically similar to REE measured. The Siervo and Falconi, Schofield and Henry and Rees equations did not have correlation with the measured calorimetry. The best-isolated predictor of the REE was the body mass and the best association when adjusted to unit (kg) was lean body mass. The equation developed in the present work was: REE(kcal/d)= 21837 - 14,448 * Weight(kg) + 54,963 * Lean Mass(kg)--9,341 * Stature(cm)--4,349 * Age(years)--19753 * Body Density(g/ml). CONCLUSION: The REE prediction equations can prompt to errors and seem to be population specific. The best prediction result was with the equation developed with anthropometrics variables of the volunteers (measured= 1617 +/- 237 kcal/d; REE-Our= 1616 +/- 167 kcal/d). SN - 0004-2730 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/17221111/[Resting_energy_expenditure_measured_vs__estimated_and_this_relationship_with_body_composition_in_women]_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -