Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Antemortem dental records: attitudes and practices of forensic dentists.
J Forensic Sci. 2007 Mar; 52(2):420-2.JF

Abstract

This study was designed to provide insight concerning the attitudes and practices of forensic dentists regarding antemortem dental records reviewed for purposes of dental identification. Forensic dentists were invited to participate in a 10 item survey. The majority of the respondents reported a considerable amount of experience in dental identifications of the deceased. Sixty-six percent reported having suspected dental negligence or fraud in their antemortem record reviews. Only 17% believe that a forensic dentist should report suspected dental negligence, while 31% agree that dental fraud should be reported. Their response to additional issues addressed in the study suggests diversity in the practices and attitudes of forensic dentists in the use of antemortem dental records. In conclusion, opening a dialogue among practicing forensic dentists may lead to a standardized set of recommendations by the appropriate societies in the forensic dental community.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials, University of Texas Dental Branch at Houston, 6516 M.D. Anderson Blvd., #493, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Veronique.F.Delattre@uth.tmc.edu

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

17316243

Citation

Delattre, Veronique F.. "Antemortem Dental Records: Attitudes and Practices of Forensic Dentists." Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 52, no. 2, 2007, pp. 420-2.
Delattre VF. Antemortem dental records: attitudes and practices of forensic dentists. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(2):420-2.
Delattre, V. F. (2007). Antemortem dental records: attitudes and practices of forensic dentists. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52(2), 420-2.
Delattre VF. Antemortem Dental Records: Attitudes and Practices of Forensic Dentists. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(2):420-2. PubMed PMID: 17316243.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Antemortem dental records: attitudes and practices of forensic dentists. A1 - Delattre,Veronique F, PY - 2007/2/24/pubmed PY - 2007/4/10/medline PY - 2007/2/24/entrez SP - 420 EP - 2 JF - Journal of forensic sciences JO - J Forensic Sci VL - 52 IS - 2 N2 - This study was designed to provide insight concerning the attitudes and practices of forensic dentists regarding antemortem dental records reviewed for purposes of dental identification. Forensic dentists were invited to participate in a 10 item survey. The majority of the respondents reported a considerable amount of experience in dental identifications of the deceased. Sixty-six percent reported having suspected dental negligence or fraud in their antemortem record reviews. Only 17% believe that a forensic dentist should report suspected dental negligence, while 31% agree that dental fraud should be reported. Their response to additional issues addressed in the study suggests diversity in the practices and attitudes of forensic dentists in the use of antemortem dental records. In conclusion, opening a dialogue among practicing forensic dentists may lead to a standardized set of recommendations by the appropriate societies in the forensic dental community. SN - 0022-1198 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/17316243/Antemortem_dental_records:_attitudes_and_practices_of_forensic_dentists_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00379.x DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -