Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Neurological complications after regional anesthesia: contemporary estimates of risk.
Anesth Analg. 2007 Apr; 104(4):965-74.A&A

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regional anesthesia (RA) provides excellent anesthesia and analgesia for many surgical procedures. Anesthesiologists and patients must understand the risks in addition to the benefits of RA to make an informed choice of anesthetic technique. Many studies that have investigated neurological complications after RA are dated, and do not reflect the increasing indications and applications of RA nor the advances in training and techniques. In this brief narrative review we collate the contemporary investigations of neurological complications after the most common RA techniques.

METHODS

We reviewed all 32 studies published between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2005 where the primary intent was to investigate neurological complications of RA.

RESULTS

The sample size of the studies that investigated neurological complications after central and peripheral (PNB) nerve blockade ranged from 4185 to 1,260,000 and 20 to 10,309 blocks, respectively. The rate of neuropathy after spinal and epidural anesthesia was 3.78:10,000 (95% CI: 1.06-13.50:10,000) and 2.19:10,000 (95% CI: 0.88-5.44:10,000), respectively. For common PNB techniques, the rate of neuropathy after interscalene brachial plexus block, axillary brachial plexus block, and femoral nerve block was 2.84:100 (95% CI 1.33-5.98:100), 1.48:100 (95% CI: 0.52-4.11:100), and 0.34:100 (95% CI: 0.04-2.81:100), respectively. The rate of permanent neurological injury after spinal and epidural anesthesia ranged from 0-4.2:10,000 and 0-7.6:10,000, respectively. Only one case of permanent neuropathy was reported among 16 studies of neurological complications after PNB.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review suggests that the rate of neurological complications after central nerve blockade is <4:10,000, or 0.04%. The rate of neuropathy after PNB is <3:100, or 3%. However, permanent neurological injury after RA is rare in contemporary anesthetic practice.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. richard.brull@uhn.on.caNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

17377115

Citation

Brull, Richard, et al. "Neurological Complications After Regional Anesthesia: Contemporary Estimates of Risk." Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 104, no. 4, 2007, pp. 965-74.
Brull R, McCartney CJ, Chan VW, et al. Neurological complications after regional anesthesia: contemporary estimates of risk. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(4):965-74.
Brull, R., McCartney, C. J., Chan, V. W., & El-Beheiry, H. (2007). Neurological complications after regional anesthesia: contemporary estimates of risk. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 104(4), 965-74.
Brull R, et al. Neurological Complications After Regional Anesthesia: Contemporary Estimates of Risk. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(4):965-74. PubMed PMID: 17377115.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Neurological complications after regional anesthesia: contemporary estimates of risk. AU - Brull,Richard, AU - McCartney,Colin J L, AU - Chan,Vincent W S, AU - El-Beheiry,Hossam, PY - 2007/3/23/pubmed PY - 2007/4/14/medline PY - 2007/3/23/entrez SP - 965 EP - 74 JF - Anesthesia and analgesia JO - Anesth Analg VL - 104 IS - 4 N2 - BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia (RA) provides excellent anesthesia and analgesia for many surgical procedures. Anesthesiologists and patients must understand the risks in addition to the benefits of RA to make an informed choice of anesthetic technique. Many studies that have investigated neurological complications after RA are dated, and do not reflect the increasing indications and applications of RA nor the advances in training and techniques. In this brief narrative review we collate the contemporary investigations of neurological complications after the most common RA techniques. METHODS: We reviewed all 32 studies published between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2005 where the primary intent was to investigate neurological complications of RA. RESULTS: The sample size of the studies that investigated neurological complications after central and peripheral (PNB) nerve blockade ranged from 4185 to 1,260,000 and 20 to 10,309 blocks, respectively. The rate of neuropathy after spinal and epidural anesthesia was 3.78:10,000 (95% CI: 1.06-13.50:10,000) and 2.19:10,000 (95% CI: 0.88-5.44:10,000), respectively. For common PNB techniques, the rate of neuropathy after interscalene brachial plexus block, axillary brachial plexus block, and femoral nerve block was 2.84:100 (95% CI 1.33-5.98:100), 1.48:100 (95% CI: 0.52-4.11:100), and 0.34:100 (95% CI: 0.04-2.81:100), respectively. The rate of permanent neurological injury after spinal and epidural anesthesia ranged from 0-4.2:10,000 and 0-7.6:10,000, respectively. Only one case of permanent neuropathy was reported among 16 studies of neurological complications after PNB. CONCLUSIONS: Our review suggests that the rate of neurological complications after central nerve blockade is <4:10,000, or 0.04%. The rate of neuropathy after PNB is <3:100, or 3%. However, permanent neurological injury after RA is rare in contemporary anesthetic practice. SN - 1526-7598 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/17377115/Neurological_complications_after_regional_anesthesia:_contemporary_estimates_of_risk_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000258740.17193.ec DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -