Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The polity of academic medicine: status of faculty governance.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Sep; 1(9):679-84.JA

Abstract

How should academic medical departments be governed? Models of governance span a wide spectrum between autocracies, in which important decisions are made by a single individual, to democracies, in which each member enjoys a voice in decision making. Despite the fact that more participatory governance models are the norm in practice settings outside of academia, many academic physicians seem to take an autocratic model more or less for granted. In fact, however, most medical schools and universities do not mandate a governance system that vests authority in a powerful chairperson, and departments frequently enjoy more latitude than they suppose in determining how to govern themselves. Because an organization's effectiveness is powerfully influenced by its governance structure, academic physicians should give serious consideration to this subject, to ensure that academic medicine is well prepared to meet the many challenges now before it.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Indiana University, Department of Radiology, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. swilling@iupui.eduNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

17411678

Citation

Willing, Steven J., et al. "The Polity of Academic Medicine: Status of Faculty Governance." Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, vol. 1, no. 9, 2004, pp. 679-84.
Willing SJ, Cochran PL, Gunderman RB. The polity of academic medicine: status of faculty governance. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1(9):679-84.
Willing, S. J., Cochran, P. L., & Gunderman, R. B. (2004). The polity of academic medicine: status of faculty governance. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 1(9), 679-84.
Willing SJ, Cochran PL, Gunderman RB. The Polity of Academic Medicine: Status of Faculty Governance. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1(9):679-84. PubMed PMID: 17411678.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The polity of academic medicine: status of faculty governance. AU - Willing,Steven J, AU - Cochran,Philip L, AU - Gunderman,Richard B, PY - 2007/4/7/pubmed PY - 2007/8/22/medline PY - 2007/4/7/entrez SP - 679 EP - 84 JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR JO - J Am Coll Radiol VL - 1 IS - 9 N2 - How should academic medical departments be governed? Models of governance span a wide spectrum between autocracies, in which important decisions are made by a single individual, to democracies, in which each member enjoys a voice in decision making. Despite the fact that more participatory governance models are the norm in practice settings outside of academia, many academic physicians seem to take an autocratic model more or less for granted. In fact, however, most medical schools and universities do not mandate a governance system that vests authority in a powerful chairperson, and departments frequently enjoy more latitude than they suppose in determining how to govern themselves. Because an organization's effectiveness is powerfully influenced by its governance structure, academic physicians should give serious consideration to this subject, to ensure that academic medicine is well prepared to meet the many challenges now before it. SN - 1558-349X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/17411678/The_polity_of_academic_medicine:_status_of_faculty_governance_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1546-1440(04)00166-8 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -