Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Simulation-based cost-utility analysis of population screening-based alendronate use in Switzerland.
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Nov; 18(11):1481-91.OI

Abstract

A simulation model adopting a health system perspective showed population-based screening with DXA, followed by alendronate treatment of persons with osteoporosis, or with anamnestic fracture and osteopenia, to be cost-effective in Swiss postmenopausal women from age 70, but not in men.

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the cost-effectiveness of a population-based screen-and-treat strategy for osteoporosis (DXA followed by alendronate treatment if osteoporotic, or osteopenic in the presence of fracture), compared to no intervention, from the perspective of the Swiss health care system.

METHODS

A published Markov model assessed by first-order Monte Carlo simulation was refined to reflect the diagnostic process and treatment effects. Women and men entered the model at age 50. Main screening ages were 65, 75, and 85 years. Age at bone densitometry was flexible for persons fracturing before the main screening age. Realistic assumptions were made with respect to persistence with intended 5 years of alendronate treatment. The main outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

RESULTS

In women, costs per QALY were Swiss francs (CHF) 71,000, CHF 35,000, and CHF 28,000 for the main screening ages of 65, 75, and 85 years. The threshold of CHF 50,000 per QALY was reached between main screening ages 65 and 75 years. Population-based screening was not cost-effective in men.

CONCLUSION

Population-based DXA screening, followed by alendronate treatment in the presence of osteoporosis, or of fracture and osteopenia, is a cost-effective option in Swiss postmenopausal women after age 70.

Authors+Show Affiliations

European Center of Pharmaceutical Medicine, University of Basel, ECPM Research, c/o ECPM Executive Office, University Hospital, 4031 Basel, Switzerland. m.schwenkglenks@unibas.chNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

17530156

Citation

Schwenkglenks, M, and K Lippuner. "Simulation-based Cost-utility Analysis of Population Screening-based Alendronate Use in Switzerland." Osteoporosis International : a Journal Established as Result of Cooperation Between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, vol. 18, no. 11, 2007, pp. 1481-91.
Schwenkglenks M, Lippuner K. Simulation-based cost-utility analysis of population screening-based alendronate use in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(11):1481-91.
Schwenkglenks, M., & Lippuner, K. (2007). Simulation-based cost-utility analysis of population screening-based alendronate use in Switzerland. Osteoporosis International : a Journal Established as Result of Cooperation Between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 18(11), 1481-91.
Schwenkglenks M, Lippuner K. Simulation-based Cost-utility Analysis of Population Screening-based Alendronate Use in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(11):1481-91. PubMed PMID: 17530156.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Simulation-based cost-utility analysis of population screening-based alendronate use in Switzerland. AU - Schwenkglenks,M, AU - Lippuner,K, Y1 - 2007/05/26/ PY - 2006/11/15/received PY - 2007/04/25/accepted PY - 2007/5/29/pubmed PY - 2008/4/22/medline PY - 2007/5/29/entrez SP - 1481 EP - 91 JF - Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA JO - Osteoporos Int VL - 18 IS - 11 N2 - UNLABELLED: A simulation model adopting a health system perspective showed population-based screening with DXA, followed by alendronate treatment of persons with osteoporosis, or with anamnestic fracture and osteopenia, to be cost-effective in Swiss postmenopausal women from age 70, but not in men. INTRODUCTION: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of a population-based screen-and-treat strategy for osteoporosis (DXA followed by alendronate treatment if osteoporotic, or osteopenic in the presence of fracture), compared to no intervention, from the perspective of the Swiss health care system. METHODS: A published Markov model assessed by first-order Monte Carlo simulation was refined to reflect the diagnostic process and treatment effects. Women and men entered the model at age 50. Main screening ages were 65, 75, and 85 years. Age at bone densitometry was flexible for persons fracturing before the main screening age. Realistic assumptions were made with respect to persistence with intended 5 years of alendronate treatment. The main outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: In women, costs per QALY were Swiss francs (CHF) 71,000, CHF 35,000, and CHF 28,000 for the main screening ages of 65, 75, and 85 years. The threshold of CHF 50,000 per QALY was reached between main screening ages 65 and 75 years. Population-based screening was not cost-effective in men. CONCLUSION: Population-based DXA screening, followed by alendronate treatment in the presence of osteoporosis, or of fracture and osteopenia, is a cost-effective option in Swiss postmenopausal women after age 70. SN - 0937-941X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/17530156/Simulation_based_cost_utility_analysis_of_population_screening_based_alendronate_use_in_Switzerland_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0390-4 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -