Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy vs. conventional lobectomy via open thoracotomy in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007 Oct; 6(5):614-7.IC

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate our personal experience with video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and compare survival between this procedure and conventional lobectomy via open thoracotomy in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma. Between May 1997 and December 2004, 140 patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma had either VATS lobectomy (VATS group, 84 patients) or standard lobectomy via open thoracotomy (open group, 56 patients) performed in our hospital. We compared overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence between the two groups. The overall survival rate five years after surgery was 72% in the open group and 82% in the VATS group. There were no significant differences in the overall survival rate between the two groups. The disease-free survival rate five years after surgery was 68% in the open group and 80% in the VATS group. There were no significant differences in the disease-free survival rate between the two groups. Five patients in the open group developed distant recurrence, whereas one patient developed regional recurrence. In the VATS group six patients developed distant recurrence, whereas one patient developed regional recurrence. We consider VATS lobectomy to be one of the therapeutic options in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University, School of Medicine, Hongo 2-1-1 Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan. m-skrb@med.juntendo.ac.jpNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Evaluation Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

17670728

Citation

Sakuraba, Motoki, et al. "Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Vs. Conventional Lobectomy Via Open Thoracotomy in Patients With Clinical Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma." Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, vol. 6, no. 5, 2007, pp. 614-7.
Sakuraba M, Miyamoto H, Oh S, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy vs. conventional lobectomy via open thoracotomy in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6(5):614-7.
Sakuraba, M., Miyamoto, H., Oh, S., Shiomi, K., Sonobe, S., Takahashi, N., Imashimizu, K., & Sakao, Y. (2007). Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy vs. conventional lobectomy via open thoracotomy in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 6(5), 614-7.
Sakuraba M, et al. Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Vs. Conventional Lobectomy Via Open Thoracotomy in Patients With Clinical Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6(5):614-7. PubMed PMID: 17670728.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy vs. conventional lobectomy via open thoracotomy in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma. AU - Sakuraba,Motoki, AU - Miyamoto,Hideaki, AU - Oh,Shiaki, AU - Shiomi,Kazu, AU - Sonobe,Satoshi, AU - Takahashi,Nobumasa, AU - Imashimizu,Kota, AU - Sakao,Yukinori, Y1 - 2007/07/26/ PY - 2007/8/3/pubmed PY - 2007/10/5/medline PY - 2007/8/3/entrez SP - 614 EP - 7 JF - Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery JO - Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg VL - 6 IS - 5 N2 - The aim of this study was to evaluate our personal experience with video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and compare survival between this procedure and conventional lobectomy via open thoracotomy in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma. Between May 1997 and December 2004, 140 patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma had either VATS lobectomy (VATS group, 84 patients) or standard lobectomy via open thoracotomy (open group, 56 patients) performed in our hospital. We compared overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence between the two groups. The overall survival rate five years after surgery was 72% in the open group and 82% in the VATS group. There were no significant differences in the overall survival rate between the two groups. The disease-free survival rate five years after surgery was 68% in the open group and 80% in the VATS group. There were no significant differences in the disease-free survival rate between the two groups. Five patients in the open group developed distant recurrence, whereas one patient developed regional recurrence. In the VATS group six patients developed distant recurrence, whereas one patient developed regional recurrence. We consider VATS lobectomy to be one of the therapeutic options in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma. SN - 1569-9285 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/17670728/Video_assisted_thoracoscopic_lobectomy_vs__conventional_lobectomy_via_open_thoracotomy_in_patients_with_clinical_stage_IA_non_small_cell_lung_carcinoma_ L2 - https://academic.oup.com/icvts/article-lookup/doi/10.1510/icvts.2007.157701 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -