Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Parafoveal-on-foveal and foveal word priming are different processes: behavioral and neurophysiological evidence.
Neuroimage. 2007 Nov 01; 38(2):321-30.N

Abstract

Parafoveal-on-foveal priming refers to the presentation of an item (the prime) in parafoveal vision followed by the presentation of an item (the target) in foveal vision. In natural reading, the 'parafoveal preview benefit' subserves fluent reading as, e.g., reading times increase when such information is not available. Yet, the neural correlates of reading are mostly studied with foveally presented stimuli and little is known of this parafoveal influence. Here, we used complementary information from a behavioral study and a magnetoencephalography experiment to clarify the relationship between parafoveal-on-foveal and foveal priming. Unlike foveal priming, parafoveal-on-foveal priming was present only at short prime-to-target delay (<100 ms). Behaviorally, the parafoveal priming effect was influenced by the prime visual field (left/right) and target lexical type (word/non-word), suggesting emphasis on perceptual analysis for LVF primes and on conceptual analysis for RVF primes. At the neural level, the overall sequence of activation was similar for foveal and parafoveal primes followed by foveal word targets, but the priming effects were bilateral for foveal primes versus left-lateralized for RVF primes. No neural effects of priming appeared for LVF primes, in line with the RVF preference imposed by the Western writing system. These results highlight the role of the left hemisphere in linguistic analysis and point out possible limitations of foveal stimulus presentation for drawing conclusions about natural reading.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Brain Research Unit, Low Temperature Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland. cyril@psy.gla.ac.ukNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

17851091

Citation

Pernet, C, et al. "Parafoveal-on-foveal and Foveal Word Priming Are Different Processes: Behavioral and Neurophysiological Evidence." NeuroImage, vol. 38, no. 2, 2007, pp. 321-30.
Pernet C, Uusvuori J, Salmelin R. Parafoveal-on-foveal and foveal word priming are different processes: behavioral and neurophysiological evidence. Neuroimage. 2007;38(2):321-30.
Pernet, C., Uusvuori, J., & Salmelin, R. (2007). Parafoveal-on-foveal and foveal word priming are different processes: behavioral and neurophysiological evidence. NeuroImage, 38(2), 321-30.
Pernet C, Uusvuori J, Salmelin R. Parafoveal-on-foveal and Foveal Word Priming Are Different Processes: Behavioral and Neurophysiological Evidence. Neuroimage. 2007 Nov 1;38(2):321-30. PubMed PMID: 17851091.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Parafoveal-on-foveal and foveal word priming are different processes: behavioral and neurophysiological evidence. AU - Pernet,C, AU - Uusvuori,J, AU - Salmelin,R, Y1 - 2007/08/08/ PY - 2007/04/23/received PY - 2007/07/18/revised PY - 2007/07/29/accepted PY - 2007/9/14/pubmed PY - 2008/1/19/medline PY - 2007/9/14/entrez SP - 321 EP - 30 JF - NeuroImage JO - Neuroimage VL - 38 IS - 2 N2 - Parafoveal-on-foveal priming refers to the presentation of an item (the prime) in parafoveal vision followed by the presentation of an item (the target) in foveal vision. In natural reading, the 'parafoveal preview benefit' subserves fluent reading as, e.g., reading times increase when such information is not available. Yet, the neural correlates of reading are mostly studied with foveally presented stimuli and little is known of this parafoveal influence. Here, we used complementary information from a behavioral study and a magnetoencephalography experiment to clarify the relationship between parafoveal-on-foveal and foveal priming. Unlike foveal priming, parafoveal-on-foveal priming was present only at short prime-to-target delay (<100 ms). Behaviorally, the parafoveal priming effect was influenced by the prime visual field (left/right) and target lexical type (word/non-word), suggesting emphasis on perceptual analysis for LVF primes and on conceptual analysis for RVF primes. At the neural level, the overall sequence of activation was similar for foveal and parafoveal primes followed by foveal word targets, but the priming effects were bilateral for foveal primes versus left-lateralized for RVF primes. No neural effects of priming appeared for LVF primes, in line with the RVF preference imposed by the Western writing system. These results highlight the role of the left hemisphere in linguistic analysis and point out possible limitations of foveal stimulus presentation for drawing conclusions about natural reading. SN - 1053-8119 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/17851091/Parafoveal_on_foveal_and_foveal_word_priming_are_different_processes:_behavioral_and_neurophysiological_evidence_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -