Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Acupuncture in migraine prevention: a randomized sham controlled study with 6-months posttreatment follow-up.
Clin J Pain. 2008 Feb; 24(2):98-105.CJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of acupuncture in migraine prophylaxis.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with migraine were enrolled in a randomized control trial at the Headache clinic located in a University Hospital. Real and sham acupuncture groups received 16 acupuncture sessions over 3 months. Treatment was individualized in the real acupuncture group and minimal acupuncture was used in the sham group. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with a >or=50% reduction in their migraine attack frequency in the second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth (months) compared with the first one (baseline period). Primary and secondary end points were measured comparing headache diaries.

RESULTS

Real acupuncture group showed improvement with significant differences compared with the sham acupuncture group in the primary efficacy end point (P=0.021) at the second month of the treatment. Differences also appeared in 2 secondary end points: number of days with migraine per month (P=0.007) in the second month and the percentage of patients with >or=40% reduction in migraine attack frequency in the first (P=0.044) and second months (P=0.004) of the treatment. These differences disappeared in the third (last) month of the treatment as a consequence of the high improvement of the sham acupuncture group. Comparisons within each group showed that several migraine parameters evaluated improved significantly in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualized treatment based on traditional Chinese medicine plays a role in preventing migraine attacks. Nevertheless, sham acupuncture had similar effects. Major conclusions were limited by the small sample sizes however the observed trends may contribute to design future trials.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain. jalecrim@uol.com.brNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18209514

Citation

Alecrim-Andrade, Jerusa, et al. "Acupuncture in Migraine Prevention: a Randomized Sham Controlled Study With 6-months Posttreatment Follow-up." The Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 24, no. 2, 2008, pp. 98-105.
Alecrim-Andrade J, Maciel-Júnior JA, Carnè X, et al. Acupuncture in migraine prevention: a randomized sham controlled study with 6-months posttreatment follow-up. Clin J Pain. 2008;24(2):98-105.
Alecrim-Andrade, J., Maciel-Júnior, J. A., Carnè, X., Severino Vasconcelos, G. M., & Correa-Filho, H. R. (2008). Acupuncture in migraine prevention: a randomized sham controlled study with 6-months posttreatment follow-up. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 24(2), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181590d66
Alecrim-Andrade J, et al. Acupuncture in Migraine Prevention: a Randomized Sham Controlled Study With 6-months Posttreatment Follow-up. Clin J Pain. 2008;24(2):98-105. PubMed PMID: 18209514.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Acupuncture in migraine prevention: a randomized sham controlled study with 6-months posttreatment follow-up. AU - Alecrim-Andrade,Jerusa, AU - Maciel-Júnior,Jayme Antunes, AU - Carnè,Xavier, AU - Severino Vasconcelos,Geraldo Magela, AU - Correa-Filho,Heleno Rodrigues, PY - 2008/1/23/pubmed PY - 2008/3/25/medline PY - 2008/1/23/entrez SP - 98 EP - 105 JF - The Clinical journal of pain JO - Clin J Pain VL - 24 IS - 2 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of acupuncture in migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with migraine were enrolled in a randomized control trial at the Headache clinic located in a University Hospital. Real and sham acupuncture groups received 16 acupuncture sessions over 3 months. Treatment was individualized in the real acupuncture group and minimal acupuncture was used in the sham group. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with a >or=50% reduction in their migraine attack frequency in the second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth (months) compared with the first one (baseline period). Primary and secondary end points were measured comparing headache diaries. RESULTS: Real acupuncture group showed improvement with significant differences compared with the sham acupuncture group in the primary efficacy end point (P=0.021) at the second month of the treatment. Differences also appeared in 2 secondary end points: number of days with migraine per month (P=0.007) in the second month and the percentage of patients with >or=40% reduction in migraine attack frequency in the first (P=0.044) and second months (P=0.004) of the treatment. These differences disappeared in the third (last) month of the treatment as a consequence of the high improvement of the sham acupuncture group. Comparisons within each group showed that several migraine parameters evaluated improved significantly in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized treatment based on traditional Chinese medicine plays a role in preventing migraine attacks. Nevertheless, sham acupuncture had similar effects. Major conclusions were limited by the small sample sizes however the observed trends may contribute to design future trials. SN - 0749-8047 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18209514/Acupuncture_in_migraine_prevention:_a_randomized_sham_controlled_study_with_6_months_posttreatment_follow_up_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -