Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Toxicities of antifouling biocide Irgarol 1051 and its major degraded product to marine primary producers.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2008; 57(6-12):575-86.MP

Abstract

Irgarol 1051 (2-methythiol-4-tert-butylamino-6-cyclopropylamino-s-triazine) is an algaecide commonly used in antifouling paints. It undergoes photodegradation which yields M1 (2-methylthio-4-tert-butylamino-6-amino-s-triazine) as its major and most stable degradant. Elevated levels of both Irgarol and M1 have been detected in coastal waters worldwide; however, ecotoxicity effects of M1 to various marine autotrophs such as cyanobacteria are still largely unknown. This study firstly examined and compared the 96 h toxicities of Irgarol and M1 to the cyanobacterium Chroococcus minor and two marine diatom species, Skeletonema costatum and Thalassiosira pseudonana. Our results suggested that Irgarol was consistently more toxic to all of the three species than M1 (96 h EC50 values: C. minor, 7.71 microug L(-1) Irgarol vs. > 200 microg L(-1) M1; S. costatum, 0.29 microg L(-1) Irgarol vs. 11.32 microg L(-1)M1; and T. pseudonana, 0.41 microg L(-1) Irgarol vs. 16.50 microg L(-1)M1). Secondly, we conducted a meta-analysis of currently available data on toxicities of Irgarol and M1 to both freshwater and marine primary producers based on species sensitivity distributions (SSDs). Interestingly, freshwater autotrophs are more sensitive to Irgarol than their marine counterparts. For marine autotrophs, microalgae are generally more sensitive to Irgarol than macroalgae and cyanobacteria. With very limited available data on M1 (i.e. five species), M1 might be less toxic than Irgarol; nonetheless this finding warrants further confirmation with additional data on other autotrophic species.

Authors+Show Affiliations

The Swire Institute of Marine Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong, Cape d'Aguilar Road, Shek O, Hong Kong, PR China.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18314144

Citation

Zhang, Amy Q., et al. "Toxicities of Antifouling Biocide Irgarol 1051 and Its Major Degraded Product to Marine Primary Producers." Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 57, no. 6-12, 2008, pp. 575-86.
Zhang AQ, Leung KM, Kwok KW, et al. Toxicities of antifouling biocide Irgarol 1051 and its major degraded product to marine primary producers. Mar Pollut Bull. 2008;57(6-12):575-86.
Zhang, A. Q., Leung, K. M., Kwok, K. W., Bao, V. W., & Lam, M. H. (2008). Toxicities of antifouling biocide Irgarol 1051 and its major degraded product to marine primary producers. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 57(6-12), 575-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.01.021
Zhang AQ, et al. Toxicities of Antifouling Biocide Irgarol 1051 and Its Major Degraded Product to Marine Primary Producers. Mar Pollut Bull. 2008;57(6-12):575-86. PubMed PMID: 18314144.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Toxicities of antifouling biocide Irgarol 1051 and its major degraded product to marine primary producers. AU - Zhang,Amy Q, AU - Leung,Kenneth M Y, AU - Kwok,Kevin W H, AU - Bao,Vivien W W, AU - Lam,Michael H W, Y1 - 2008/03/07/ PY - 2007/07/26/received PY - 2007/12/18/revised PY - 2008/01/15/accepted PY - 2008/3/4/pubmed PY - 2008/10/2/medline PY - 2008/3/4/entrez SP - 575 EP - 86 JF - Marine pollution bulletin JO - Mar Pollut Bull VL - 57 IS - 6-12 N2 - Irgarol 1051 (2-methythiol-4-tert-butylamino-6-cyclopropylamino-s-triazine) is an algaecide commonly used in antifouling paints. It undergoes photodegradation which yields M1 (2-methylthio-4-tert-butylamino-6-amino-s-triazine) as its major and most stable degradant. Elevated levels of both Irgarol and M1 have been detected in coastal waters worldwide; however, ecotoxicity effects of M1 to various marine autotrophs such as cyanobacteria are still largely unknown. This study firstly examined and compared the 96 h toxicities of Irgarol and M1 to the cyanobacterium Chroococcus minor and two marine diatom species, Skeletonema costatum and Thalassiosira pseudonana. Our results suggested that Irgarol was consistently more toxic to all of the three species than M1 (96 h EC50 values: C. minor, 7.71 microug L(-1) Irgarol vs. > 200 microg L(-1) M1; S. costatum, 0.29 microg L(-1) Irgarol vs. 11.32 microg L(-1)M1; and T. pseudonana, 0.41 microg L(-1) Irgarol vs. 16.50 microg L(-1)M1). Secondly, we conducted a meta-analysis of currently available data on toxicities of Irgarol and M1 to both freshwater and marine primary producers based on species sensitivity distributions (SSDs). Interestingly, freshwater autotrophs are more sensitive to Irgarol than their marine counterparts. For marine autotrophs, microalgae are generally more sensitive to Irgarol than macroalgae and cyanobacteria. With very limited available data on M1 (i.e. five species), M1 might be less toxic than Irgarol; nonetheless this finding warrants further confirmation with additional data on other autotrophic species. SN - 0025-326X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18314144/Toxicities_of_antifouling_biocide_Irgarol_1051_and_its_major_degraded_product_to_marine_primary_producers_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -