Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Measuring competence in endoscopic sinus surgery.
Surgeon. 2008 Feb; 6(1):37-44.S

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Competence based education is currently being introduced into higher surgical training in the UK. Valid and reliable performance assessment tools are essential to ensure competencies are achieved. No such tools have yet been reported in the UK literature.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to develop and pilot test an Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Competence Assessment Tool (ESSCAT). The ESSCAT was designed for in-theatre assessment of higher surgical trainees in the UK.

METHODS

The ESSCAT rating matrix was developed through task analysis of ESS procedures. All otolaryngology consultants and specialist registrars in Scotland were given the opportunity to contribute to its refinement. Two cycles of in-theatre testing were used to ensure utility and gather quantitative data on validity and reliability. Videos of trainees performing surgery were used in establishing inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

National consultation, the consensus derived minimum standard of performance, Cronbach's alpha = 0.89 and demonstration of trainee learning (p = 0.027) during the in vivo application of the ESSCAT suggest a high level of validity. Inter-rater reliability was moderate for competence decisions (Cohen's Kappa = 0.5) and good for total scores (Intra-Class Correlation Co-efficient = 0.63). Intra-rater reliability was good for both competence decisions (Kappa = 0.67) and total scores (Kendall's Tau-b = 0.73).

CONCLUSION

The ESSCAT generates a valid and reliable assessment of trainees' in-theatre performance of endoscopic sinus surgery. In conjunction with ongoing evaluation of the instrument we recommend the use of the ESSCAT in higher specialist training in otolaryngology in the UK.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Medical Education, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Validation Study

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18318087

Citation

Syme-Grant, J, et al. "Measuring Competence in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery." The Surgeon : Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland, vol. 6, no. 1, 2008, pp. 37-44.
Syme-Grant J, White PS, McAleer JP. Measuring competence in endoscopic sinus surgery. Surgeon. 2008;6(1):37-44.
Syme-Grant, J., White, P. S., & McAleer, J. P. (2008). Measuring competence in endoscopic sinus surgery. The Surgeon : Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland, 6(1), 37-44.
Syme-Grant J, White PS, McAleer JP. Measuring Competence in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Surgeon. 2008;6(1):37-44. PubMed PMID: 18318087.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Measuring competence in endoscopic sinus surgery. AU - Syme-Grant,J, AU - White,P S, AU - McAleer,J P G, PY - 2008/3/6/pubmed PY - 2008/4/11/medline PY - 2008/3/6/entrez SP - 37 EP - 44 JF - The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland JO - Surgeon VL - 6 IS - 1 N2 - BACKGROUND: Competence based education is currently being introduced into higher surgical training in the UK. Valid and reliable performance assessment tools are essential to ensure competencies are achieved. No such tools have yet been reported in the UK literature. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop and pilot test an Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Competence Assessment Tool (ESSCAT). The ESSCAT was designed for in-theatre assessment of higher surgical trainees in the UK. METHODS: The ESSCAT rating matrix was developed through task analysis of ESS procedures. All otolaryngology consultants and specialist registrars in Scotland were given the opportunity to contribute to its refinement. Two cycles of in-theatre testing were used to ensure utility and gather quantitative data on validity and reliability. Videos of trainees performing surgery were used in establishing inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: National consultation, the consensus derived minimum standard of performance, Cronbach's alpha = 0.89 and demonstration of trainee learning (p = 0.027) during the in vivo application of the ESSCAT suggest a high level of validity. Inter-rater reliability was moderate for competence decisions (Cohen's Kappa = 0.5) and good for total scores (Intra-Class Correlation Co-efficient = 0.63). Intra-rater reliability was good for both competence decisions (Kappa = 0.67) and total scores (Kendall's Tau-b = 0.73). CONCLUSION: The ESSCAT generates a valid and reliable assessment of trainees' in-theatre performance of endoscopic sinus surgery. In conjunction with ongoing evaluation of the instrument we recommend the use of the ESSCAT in higher specialist training in otolaryngology in the UK. SN - 1479-666X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18318087/Measuring_competence_in_endoscopic_sinus_surgery_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -