Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Sample preparation optimization in wine and grapes. Dilution and sample/headspace volume equilibrium theory for headspace solid-phase microextraction.
J Chromatogr A. 2008 May 23; 1192(1):25-35.JC

Abstract

Most headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) volatile analysis methods have been developed for aqueous samples and have been either adapted or applied to complex matrices. This study examines sample/headspace equilibrium based on realistic (non-spiked) concentration levels in real complex sample matrices (grapes and wine) with a systematic multivariate statistical approach. The presence and absence of matrix effects are explained through exponential and linear relationships, respectively. The potential of over- and underestimating volatile compounds in a diluted sample is illustrated and the common dilution equation (C1V1=C2V2) is shown to not always apply to headspace volatile analysis. Additionally, sample dilution was shown to be more sensitive to matrix effects than sample/headspace volume variations with the latter showing analyte dependency. An optimum sample size of 6.9-8.6g in a 20mL vial without dilution was observed. This study shows that sensitivity and limit of detection (LOD) can be improved to a limit with a subsequent loss - an extension to existing theory. The study further illustrates that in trying to bring an analyte within linear range through sample dilution, sensitivity and LOD can be lost with a probable shift in optimum ranges and sample/headspace equilibrium.

Authors+Show Affiliations

CSIRO Plant Industry and Food Futures Flagship, P.O. Box 350, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia. curtis.kalua@csiro.auNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18400228

Citation

Kalua, Curtis M., and Paul K. Boss. "Sample Preparation Optimization in Wine and Grapes. Dilution and Sample/headspace Volume Equilibrium Theory for Headspace Solid-phase Microextraction." Journal of Chromatography. A, vol. 1192, no. 1, 2008, pp. 25-35.
Kalua CM, Boss PK. Sample preparation optimization in wine and grapes. Dilution and sample/headspace volume equilibrium theory for headspace solid-phase microextraction. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1192(1):25-35.
Kalua, C. M., & Boss, P. K. (2008). Sample preparation optimization in wine and grapes. Dilution and sample/headspace volume equilibrium theory for headspace solid-phase microextraction. Journal of Chromatography. A, 1192(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.03.053
Kalua CM, Boss PK. Sample Preparation Optimization in Wine and Grapes. Dilution and Sample/headspace Volume Equilibrium Theory for Headspace Solid-phase Microextraction. J Chromatogr A. 2008 May 23;1192(1):25-35. PubMed PMID: 18400228.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Sample preparation optimization in wine and grapes. Dilution and sample/headspace volume equilibrium theory for headspace solid-phase microextraction. AU - Kalua,Curtis M, AU - Boss,Paul K, Y1 - 2008/03/22/ PY - 2008/01/24/received PY - 2008/03/11/revised PY - 2008/03/13/accepted PY - 2008/4/11/pubmed PY - 2008/7/22/medline PY - 2008/4/11/entrez SP - 25 EP - 35 JF - Journal of chromatography. A JO - J Chromatogr A VL - 1192 IS - 1 N2 - Most headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) volatile analysis methods have been developed for aqueous samples and have been either adapted or applied to complex matrices. This study examines sample/headspace equilibrium based on realistic (non-spiked) concentration levels in real complex sample matrices (grapes and wine) with a systematic multivariate statistical approach. The presence and absence of matrix effects are explained through exponential and linear relationships, respectively. The potential of over- and underestimating volatile compounds in a diluted sample is illustrated and the common dilution equation (C1V1=C2V2) is shown to not always apply to headspace volatile analysis. Additionally, sample dilution was shown to be more sensitive to matrix effects than sample/headspace volume variations with the latter showing analyte dependency. An optimum sample size of 6.9-8.6g in a 20mL vial without dilution was observed. This study shows that sensitivity and limit of detection (LOD) can be improved to a limit with a subsequent loss - an extension to existing theory. The study further illustrates that in trying to bring an analyte within linear range through sample dilution, sensitivity and LOD can be lost with a probable shift in optimum ranges and sample/headspace equilibrium. SN - 0021-9673 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18400228/Sample_preparation_optimization_in_wine_and_grapes__Dilution_and_sample/headspace_volume_equilibrium_theory_for_headspace_solid_phase_microextraction_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -