Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the dimensions of the upper and lower dental arches in Class II division 1 malocclusion with a mandibular deficiency compared to normal Class I occlusion dental arches.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Photocopies of the dental arches of 48 patients exhibiting Class II division 1 malocclusion with mandibular deficiency and of 51 individuals with normal occlusion were compared. Mandibular deficiency was diagnosed clinically. All 99 individuals were in the permanent dentition. The ages of the subjects ranged from 11 years 4 months to 20 years (mean age = 12 years 5 months).
RESULTS
When compared to subjects with normal occlusion, the upper dental arches of the Class II division 1 patients presented reduced transverse dimensions and longer sagittal dimensions while the lower arches were less influenced.
CONCLUSION
The hypothesis is rejected. Significant differences are present between the dimensions of the upper and lower dental arches in Class II division 1 malocclusion (with a mandibular deficiency and in the permanent dentition) compared to normal Class I occlusion dental arches.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Dental arch dimensions in Class II division 1 malocclusions with mandibular deficiency.
AU - da Silva Filho,Omar Gabriel,
AU - Ferrari Júnior,Flávio Mauro,
AU - Okada Ozawa,Terumi,
PY - 2007/02/01/received
PY - 2007/07/01/accepted
PY - 2008/4/18/pubmed
PY - 2008/7/11/medline
PY - 2008/4/18/entrez
SP - 466
EP - 74
JF - The Angle orthodontist
JO - Angle Orthod
VL - 78
IS - 3
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the dimensions of the upper and lower dental arches in Class II division 1 malocclusion with a mandibular deficiency compared to normal Class I occlusion dental arches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Photocopies of the dental arches of 48 patients exhibiting Class II division 1 malocclusion with mandibular deficiency and of 51 individuals with normal occlusion were compared. Mandibular deficiency was diagnosed clinically. All 99 individuals were in the permanent dentition. The ages of the subjects ranged from 11 years 4 months to 20 years (mean age = 12 years 5 months). RESULTS: When compared to subjects with normal occlusion, the upper dental arches of the Class II division 1 patients presented reduced transverse dimensions and longer sagittal dimensions while the lower arches were less influenced. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis is rejected. Significant differences are present between the dimensions of the upper and lower dental arches in Class II division 1 malocclusion (with a mandibular deficiency and in the permanent dentition) compared to normal Class I occlusion dental arches.
SN - 0003-3219
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18416613/Dental_arch_dimensions_in_Class_II_division_1_malocclusions_with_mandibular_deficiency_
L2 - https://meridian.allenpress.com/angle-orthodontist/article-lookup/doi/10.2319/022307-89.1
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -