Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Reduction in beta2-microglobulin with super-flux versus high-flux dialysis membranes: results of a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Jul; 52(1):93-101.AJ

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uremic toxicity is a major concern in the dialysis population. There is keen interest in techniques that increase the removal of larger uremic molecules. We examined the short-term impact of a new, more porous, super-flux Helixone membrane (FX-E) versus the conventional high-flux Helixone membrane (FX-60) on beta(2)-microglobulin (beta2M) reduction and nutritional and inflammatory parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, double blind, crossover, pilot trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

A single freestanding dialysis center. 30 stable hemodialysis patients.

INTERVENTION

Patients were treated with FX-60 and FX-E membranes for a treatment period of 6 weeks each, with a 2-week washout period in between.

OUTCOME & MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcome was change in beta2M concentrations from baseline to end of treatment. Serum samples were obtained predialysis and postdialysis at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, and dialysate albumin samples were collected continuously throughout dialysis sessions.

RESULTS

Mean postdialysis beta2M concentrations at the end of 6 weeks of treatment were 6.73 mg/L for FX-E versus 8.22 mg/L for FX-60, which was significantly lower overall by 0.69 mg/L (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.09 to -0.29; P = 0.001). beta2M reduction ratios were greater overall with FX-E by 4.83% (95% CI, 2.78 to 6.89; P < 0.001), with mean values of 57% for FX-60 versus 66% for FX-E at the end of treatment. Median dialysate albumin loss with FX-E was 1.23 g (range, 0.22 to 4.83 g) compared with 0.17 g (range, 0.0017 to 2.69 g) with FX-60, which was greater by 1.52 g (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.93; P < 0.001). Serum albumin concentrations were slightly lower with FX-E by 0.1 g/dL (0.55 g/L; 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.07; P = 0.03), but prealbumin concentrations were not significantly different at 8.53 mg/L (95% CI, -23.76 to 6.71; P = 0.3). There were no differences in inflammatory cytokine concentrations or small-solute removal.

LIMITATIONS

Short-term pilot study.

CONCLUSION

In this stable dialysis population, removal of beta2M was more efficient with the Helixone super-flux FX-E membrane, with only a small decrease in albumin concentrations despite increased albumin loss. Large trials with longer treatment periods are required to evaluate the impact of the FX-E membrane on clinical outcomes.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. rebecca.pellicano@med.monash.edu.auNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18423807

Citation

Pellicano, Rebecca, et al. "Reduction in Beta2-microglobulin With Super-flux Versus High-flux Dialysis Membranes: Results of a 6-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover Trial." American Journal of Kidney Diseases : the Official Journal of the National Kidney Foundation, vol. 52, no. 1, 2008, pp. 93-101.
Pellicano R, Polkinghorne KR, Kerr PG. Reduction in beta2-microglobulin with super-flux versus high-flux dialysis membranes: results of a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52(1):93-101.
Pellicano, R., Polkinghorne, K. R., & Kerr, P. G. (2008). Reduction in beta2-microglobulin with super-flux versus high-flux dialysis membranes: results of a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. American Journal of Kidney Diseases : the Official Journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 52(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.02.296
Pellicano R, Polkinghorne KR, Kerr PG. Reduction in Beta2-microglobulin With Super-flux Versus High-flux Dialysis Membranes: Results of a 6-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover Trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52(1):93-101. PubMed PMID: 18423807.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Reduction in beta2-microglobulin with super-flux versus high-flux dialysis membranes: results of a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. AU - Pellicano,Rebecca, AU - Polkinghorne,Kevan R, AU - Kerr,Peter G, Y1 - 2008/04/18/ PY - 2007/08/23/received PY - 2008/02/12/accepted PY - 2008/4/22/pubmed PY - 2008/8/1/medline PY - 2008/4/22/entrez SP - 93 EP - 101 JF - American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation JO - Am J Kidney Dis VL - 52 IS - 1 N2 - BACKGROUND: Uremic toxicity is a major concern in the dialysis population. There is keen interest in techniques that increase the removal of larger uremic molecules. We examined the short-term impact of a new, more porous, super-flux Helixone membrane (FX-E) versus the conventional high-flux Helixone membrane (FX-60) on beta(2)-microglobulin (beta2M) reduction and nutritional and inflammatory parameters. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double blind, crossover, pilot trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A single freestanding dialysis center. 30 stable hemodialysis patients. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with FX-60 and FX-E membranes for a treatment period of 6 weeks each, with a 2-week washout period in between. OUTCOME & MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was change in beta2M concentrations from baseline to end of treatment. Serum samples were obtained predialysis and postdialysis at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, and dialysate albumin samples were collected continuously throughout dialysis sessions. RESULTS: Mean postdialysis beta2M concentrations at the end of 6 weeks of treatment were 6.73 mg/L for FX-E versus 8.22 mg/L for FX-60, which was significantly lower overall by 0.69 mg/L (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.09 to -0.29; P = 0.001). beta2M reduction ratios were greater overall with FX-E by 4.83% (95% CI, 2.78 to 6.89; P < 0.001), with mean values of 57% for FX-60 versus 66% for FX-E at the end of treatment. Median dialysate albumin loss with FX-E was 1.23 g (range, 0.22 to 4.83 g) compared with 0.17 g (range, 0.0017 to 2.69 g) with FX-60, which was greater by 1.52 g (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.93; P < 0.001). Serum albumin concentrations were slightly lower with FX-E by 0.1 g/dL (0.55 g/L; 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.07; P = 0.03), but prealbumin concentrations were not significantly different at 8.53 mg/L (95% CI, -23.76 to 6.71; P = 0.3). There were no differences in inflammatory cytokine concentrations or small-solute removal. LIMITATIONS: Short-term pilot study. CONCLUSION: In this stable dialysis population, removal of beta2M was more efficient with the Helixone super-flux FX-E membrane, with only a small decrease in albumin concentrations despite increased albumin loss. Large trials with longer treatment periods are required to evaluate the impact of the FX-E membrane on clinical outcomes. SN - 1523-6838 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18423807/Reduction_in_beta2_microglobulin_with_super_flux_versus_high_flux_dialysis_membranes:_results_of_a_6_week_randomized_double_blind_crossover_trial_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -