Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Association of the canine guidance angle with maxillary and mandibular intercanine widths and anterior alignment relapse: Extraction vs nonextraction treatment.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 May; 133(5):669-80.AJ

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Long-term stability is an important measure of the success of orthodontic treatment. Research in the 1970s suggested that premolar extraction treatment had poor stability over the long term. The purpose of this prospective follow-up study was to investigate changes in intercanine widths and the irregularity index during the postretention phase in patients treated with and without extractions. Associations between the maxillary canine guidance angle and the mandibular intercanine widths and the mandibular irregularity index were also examined.

METHODS

Two groups of 30 patients each, with and without premolar extractions, were studied and the results compared. Records were taken at pretreatment, at bracket removal, at the end of retention, and out of retention. The times out of retention were 6.3 years for the nonextraction group and 6.5 years for the extraction group. Stone casts were mounted on an articulator with an anatomical facebow and a central wax record. The measurements were made with a 3-dimensional digitizer.

RESULTS

Maxillary and mandibular intercanine distances behaved differently. The mandibular intercanine distance showed a net decrease between pretreatment and follow-up, whereas the maxillary arch had a net increase. The maxillary canine guidance angle at the end of retention, measured to the axis-orbital plane, was highly associated with relapse of mandibular anterior alignment and change of the mandibular intercanine distance.

CONCLUSIONS

Methods are needed that consider the anatomical configuration of the teeth for bracket selection before treatment. Individualized brackets (torque) should then be coordinated with the guidance angle of the maxillary teeth.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Orthodontics, Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria. Dr.Heiser@aon.atNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18456140

Citation

Heiser, Wolfgang, et al. "Association of the Canine Guidance Angle With Maxillary and Mandibular Intercanine Widths and Anterior Alignment Relapse: Extraction Vs Nonextraction Treatment." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics : Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, vol. 133, no. 5, 2008, pp. 669-80.
Heiser W, Richter M, Niederwanger A, et al. Association of the canine guidance angle with maxillary and mandibular intercanine widths and anterior alignment relapse: Extraction vs nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(5):669-80.
Heiser, W., Richter, M., Niederwanger, A., Neunteufel, N., & Kulmer, S. (2008). Association of the canine guidance angle with maxillary and mandibular intercanine widths and anterior alignment relapse: Extraction vs nonextraction treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics : Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 133(5), 669-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.044
Heiser W, et al. Association of the Canine Guidance Angle With Maxillary and Mandibular Intercanine Widths and Anterior Alignment Relapse: Extraction Vs Nonextraction Treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(5):669-80. PubMed PMID: 18456140.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Association of the canine guidance angle with maxillary and mandibular intercanine widths and anterior alignment relapse: Extraction vs nonextraction treatment. AU - Heiser,Wolfgang, AU - Richter,Martin, AU - Niederwanger,Andreas, AU - Neunteufel,Nikolaus, AU - Kulmer,Siegfried, PY - 2006/01/01/received PY - 2006/04/01/revised PY - 2006/04/01/accepted PY - 2008/5/6/pubmed PY - 2008/5/28/medline PY - 2008/5/6/entrez SP - 669 EP - 80 JF - American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics JO - Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop VL - 133 IS - 5 N2 - INTRODUCTION: Long-term stability is an important measure of the success of orthodontic treatment. Research in the 1970s suggested that premolar extraction treatment had poor stability over the long term. The purpose of this prospective follow-up study was to investigate changes in intercanine widths and the irregularity index during the postretention phase in patients treated with and without extractions. Associations between the maxillary canine guidance angle and the mandibular intercanine widths and the mandibular irregularity index were also examined. METHODS: Two groups of 30 patients each, with and without premolar extractions, were studied and the results compared. Records were taken at pretreatment, at bracket removal, at the end of retention, and out of retention. The times out of retention were 6.3 years for the nonextraction group and 6.5 years for the extraction group. Stone casts were mounted on an articulator with an anatomical facebow and a central wax record. The measurements were made with a 3-dimensional digitizer. RESULTS: Maxillary and mandibular intercanine distances behaved differently. The mandibular intercanine distance showed a net decrease between pretreatment and follow-up, whereas the maxillary arch had a net increase. The maxillary canine guidance angle at the end of retention, measured to the axis-orbital plane, was highly associated with relapse of mandibular anterior alignment and change of the mandibular intercanine distance. CONCLUSIONS: Methods are needed that consider the anatomical configuration of the teeth for bracket selection before treatment. Individualized brackets (torque) should then be coordinated with the guidance angle of the maxillary teeth. SN - 1097-6752 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18456140/Association_of_the_canine_guidance_angle_with_maxillary_and_mandibular_intercanine_widths_and_anterior_alignment_relapse:_Extraction_vs_nonextraction_treatment_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0889-5406(07)01207-3 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -