Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 15; 33(11):E362-5.S

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to conduct the cross-cultural adaptation of Neck Disability Index (NDI) and investigate the validity and reliability of Turkish version in patients with neck pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The NDI is a reliable evaluation instrument for disability but there are no published Turkish version.

METHODS

Eighty-eight patients with neck pain for at least 3 months were included in the study. NDI, The Neck Pain and Disability Scale and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were completed by all subjects. Test-retest reliability was determined by using intraclass correlation coefficient and Pearson's correlation analysis. For the determination of concurrent validity, the relation between NDI and VAS was examined by Pearson's correlation analysis and for the determination of construct validity, the relation between NDI and Neck Pain and Disability Scale was investigated.

RESULTS

Intraclass correlation coefficient score for test-retest reliability was 0.979 (95%, confidence interval = 0.968-0.986). For concurrent validity, the relation between NDI and VAS was investigated, the r value for test and retest was 0.508 and 0.620, respectively (P < 0.0001). For construct validity, the relation between NDI and the Turkish version of NPDA was investigated, the r value for test and retest was 0.659 (P < 0.0001) and 0.728 (P < 0.0001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of NDI was found to be a valid and reliable method of measurement for evaluating disability, caused by problems of the neck region as it is easy to comprehend by the patients and the time needed to apply is short in clinics.

Authors+Show Affiliations

School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. fztemine@yahoo.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Validation Study

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18469684

Citation

Aslan, Emine, et al. "The Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of Neck Disability Index in Patients With Neck Pain: a Turkish Version Study." Spine, vol. 33, no. 11, 2008, pp. E362-5.
Aslan E, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, et al. The cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(11):E362-5.
Aslan, E., Karaduman, A., Yakut, Y., Aras, B., Simsek, I. E., & Yaglý, N. (2008). The cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study. Spine, 33(11), E362-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817144e1
Aslan E, et al. The Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of Neck Disability Index in Patients With Neck Pain: a Turkish Version Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 15;33(11):E362-5. PubMed PMID: 18469684.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study. AU - Aslan,Emine, AU - Karaduman,Ayse, AU - Yakut,Yavuz, AU - Aras,Bahar, AU - Simsek,Ibrahim Engin, AU - Yaglý,Naciye, PY - 2008/5/13/pubmed PY - 2008/9/25/medline PY - 2008/5/13/entrez SP - E362 EP - 5 JF - Spine JO - Spine (Phila Pa 1976) VL - 33 IS - 11 N2 - OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to conduct the cross-cultural adaptation of Neck Disability Index (NDI) and investigate the validity and reliability of Turkish version in patients with neck pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The NDI is a reliable evaluation instrument for disability but there are no published Turkish version. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with neck pain for at least 3 months were included in the study. NDI, The Neck Pain and Disability Scale and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were completed by all subjects. Test-retest reliability was determined by using intraclass correlation coefficient and Pearson's correlation analysis. For the determination of concurrent validity, the relation between NDI and VAS was examined by Pearson's correlation analysis and for the determination of construct validity, the relation between NDI and Neck Pain and Disability Scale was investigated. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient score for test-retest reliability was 0.979 (95%, confidence interval = 0.968-0.986). For concurrent validity, the relation between NDI and VAS was investigated, the r value for test and retest was 0.508 and 0.620, respectively (P < 0.0001). For construct validity, the relation between NDI and the Turkish version of NPDA was investigated, the r value for test and retest was 0.659 (P < 0.0001) and 0.728 (P < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of NDI was found to be a valid and reliable method of measurement for evaluating disability, caused by problems of the neck region as it is easy to comprehend by the patients and the time needed to apply is short in clinics. SN - 1528-1159 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18469684/The_cultural_adaptation_reliability_and_validity_of_neck_disability_index_in_patients_with_neck_pain:_a_Turkish_version_study_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817144e1 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -