Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Upper eyelid reconstruction with forehead galeal flap.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Jul; 62(7):901-5.JP

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Upper lid reconstruction depends on the size of the defect, and a general consensus holds that partial-thickness defects can be reconstructed using simple or composite grafts. Full-thickness defects involving up to 30% of the upper lid are repaired easily by direct suturing with or without upper lid sliding flaps. When defects affect more than 50-70% of the upper lid, complex reconstruction is needed. Traditionally, this devolves upon lower lid flaps, as in the Cutler-Beard and Mustardé techniques. These methods share intrinsic disadvantages, such as donor site morbidity and the need for two surgical sessions to detach the flap pedicle. To our knowledge, upper lid reconstruction with a grafted forehead galeal-pericranial flap has not been previously reported. This proves to be an excellent reconstructive option for extensive upper lip defects. Moreover, it has many advantages over other reconstruction techniques, such as technical ease and very low donor site morbidity. Furthermore, it is a single-stage procedure. We present our experience with five extensive upper lid reconstructions using galeal-pericranial forehead grafted flaps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five patients needed major upper lid reconstruction, which consisted of a galeal-pericranial forehead flap grafted with oral mucosa and retroauricular skin. Four of them had had the lid removed surgically for oncological reasons, while one patient suffered from orbital-periorbital fasciitis.

RESULTS

All of the flaps and grafts survived. The functional and morphological results were satisfying, and no complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The forehead galeal-pericranial flap appears to be an excellent instrument for upper lid reconstruction. Compared to other techniques, it has the advantages of simplicity and very minimal donor site morbidity. Moreover, it does not necessitate a two-stage surgical procedure.

Authors+Show Affiliations

University of Milan, San Paolo Hospital, Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Via A. Di Rudiní 8, 20100 Milan, Italy.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18472325

Citation

Brusati, Roberto, et al. "Upper Eyelid Reconstruction With Forehead Galeal Flap." Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery : JPRAS, vol. 62, no. 7, 2009, pp. 901-5.
Brusati R, Colletti G, Redaelli V. Upper eyelid reconstruction with forehead galeal flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(7):901-5.
Brusati, R., Colletti, G., & Redaelli, V. (2009). Upper eyelid reconstruction with forehead galeal flap. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery : JPRAS, 62(7), 901-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.11.055
Brusati R, Colletti G, Redaelli V. Upper Eyelid Reconstruction With Forehead Galeal Flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(7):901-5. PubMed PMID: 18472325.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Upper eyelid reconstruction with forehead galeal flap. AU - Brusati,Roberto, AU - Colletti,Giacomo, AU - Redaelli,Valentina, Y1 - 2008/05/12/ PY - 2007/04/23/received PY - 2007/10/09/revised PY - 2007/11/04/accepted PY - 2008/5/13/pubmed PY - 2009/7/14/medline PY - 2008/5/13/entrez SP - 901 EP - 5 JF - Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS JO - J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg VL - 62 IS - 7 N2 - INTRODUCTION: Upper lid reconstruction depends on the size of the defect, and a general consensus holds that partial-thickness defects can be reconstructed using simple or composite grafts. Full-thickness defects involving up to 30% of the upper lid are repaired easily by direct suturing with or without upper lid sliding flaps. When defects affect more than 50-70% of the upper lid, complex reconstruction is needed. Traditionally, this devolves upon lower lid flaps, as in the Cutler-Beard and Mustardé techniques. These methods share intrinsic disadvantages, such as donor site morbidity and the need for two surgical sessions to detach the flap pedicle. To our knowledge, upper lid reconstruction with a grafted forehead galeal-pericranial flap has not been previously reported. This proves to be an excellent reconstructive option for extensive upper lip defects. Moreover, it has many advantages over other reconstruction techniques, such as technical ease and very low donor site morbidity. Furthermore, it is a single-stage procedure. We present our experience with five extensive upper lid reconstructions using galeal-pericranial forehead grafted flaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five patients needed major upper lid reconstruction, which consisted of a galeal-pericranial forehead flap grafted with oral mucosa and retroauricular skin. Four of them had had the lid removed surgically for oncological reasons, while one patient suffered from orbital-periorbital fasciitis. RESULTS: All of the flaps and grafts survived. The functional and morphological results were satisfying, and no complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The forehead galeal-pericranial flap appears to be an excellent instrument for upper lid reconstruction. Compared to other techniques, it has the advantages of simplicity and very minimal donor site morbidity. Moreover, it does not necessitate a two-stage surgical procedure. SN - 1878-0539 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18472325/Upper_eyelid_reconstruction_with_forehead_galeal_flap_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -