Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Argentinean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 20; 33(12):1391-5.S

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Psychometric testing of a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE

Argentinean Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) validation and cross-cultural adaptation for its use in Argentinean population with lumbar pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The RMDQ is one of the most widely used and validated instruments for measuring disability in low back pain. However, no validated Argentine version of the Test was available at the time our study was initiated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The RMDQ Argentinean cross-cultural adaptation was tested among 132 chronic lumbar pain patients, of which, 50 completed the pre-final RMDQ questionnaire and did a retest 24 hours later. The data gathered, as well as the absent response rate and the conflictive sentences for the patient were reviewed. There were no sentences marked as conflictive, therefore, the RMDQ (final) was handed out to another 82 patients. The interclass correlation coefficient was used to assess reliability and internal consistency by means of the Cronbach's alpha. The convergent validity was assessed calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient comparing the RMDQ's results with: the amount of pain (EVA), the range of movement of the spine, and the tightening of the hamstrings by means of the Active Knee Extension Test (through digital inclinometry).

RESULTS

Reliability Test-retest (24 hours): interclass correlation coefficient: 0.940 (P < 0.01). Internal consistency reached 0.904 Cronbach's alpha. The RMDQ's convergent validity calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient was r: 0.544 (P < 0.01) for EVA and r: -0.378 (P < 0.01) for range of movement from T1, which is in agreement with previous results published in similar studies. Concurrent validity was assessed correlating the RMDQ results with the Argentinean Oswestry Disability Index calculating Pearson's Coefficient and it proved very good, r: 0.811 (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results of the study show that the Argentinean version of the RMDQ is reliable and valid as a lumbar disability measurement tool. The authors recommend this tool for future clinical studies.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Therapeutic Education and Rehabilitation Institute, FLENI, Pain Center.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Validation Study

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18496354

Citation

Scharovsky, Aníbal, et al. "Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Argentinean Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire." Spine, vol. 33, no. 12, 2008, pp. 1391-5.
Scharovsky A, Pueyrredón M, Craig D, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Argentinean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(12):1391-5.
Scharovsky, A., Pueyrredón, M., Craig, D., Rivas, M. E., Converso, G., Pueyrredón, J. H., Salvat, F., & Alzúa, O. (2008). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Argentinean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine, 33(12), 1391-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318173dc8f
Scharovsky A, et al. Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Argentinean Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 20;33(12):1391-5. PubMed PMID: 18496354.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Argentinean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. AU - Scharovsky,Aníbal, AU - Pueyrredón,Manuel, AU - Craig,Debora, AU - Rivas,María Elisa, AU - Converso,Gabriel, AU - Pueyrredón,Julio H, AU - Salvat,Fernando, AU - Alzúa,Oscar, PY - 2008/5/23/pubmed PY - 2008/7/4/medline PY - 2008/5/23/entrez SP - 1391 EP - 5 JF - Spine JO - Spine (Phila Pa 1976) VL - 33 IS - 12 N2 - STUDY DESIGN: Psychometric testing of a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire. OBJECTIVE: Argentinean Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) validation and cross-cultural adaptation for its use in Argentinean population with lumbar pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The RMDQ is one of the most widely used and validated instruments for measuring disability in low back pain. However, no validated Argentine version of the Test was available at the time our study was initiated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RMDQ Argentinean cross-cultural adaptation was tested among 132 chronic lumbar pain patients, of which, 50 completed the pre-final RMDQ questionnaire and did a retest 24 hours later. The data gathered, as well as the absent response rate and the conflictive sentences for the patient were reviewed. There were no sentences marked as conflictive, therefore, the RMDQ (final) was handed out to another 82 patients. The interclass correlation coefficient was used to assess reliability and internal consistency by means of the Cronbach's alpha. The convergent validity was assessed calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient comparing the RMDQ's results with: the amount of pain (EVA), the range of movement of the spine, and the tightening of the hamstrings by means of the Active Knee Extension Test (through digital inclinometry). RESULTS: Reliability Test-retest (24 hours): interclass correlation coefficient: 0.940 (P < 0.01). Internal consistency reached 0.904 Cronbach's alpha. The RMDQ's convergent validity calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient was r: 0.544 (P < 0.01) for EVA and r: -0.378 (P < 0.01) for range of movement from T1, which is in agreement with previous results published in similar studies. Concurrent validity was assessed correlating the RMDQ results with the Argentinean Oswestry Disability Index calculating Pearson's Coefficient and it proved very good, r: 0.811 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that the Argentinean version of the RMDQ is reliable and valid as a lumbar disability measurement tool. The authors recommend this tool for future clinical studies. SN - 1528-1159 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18496354/Cross_cultural_adaptation_and_validation_of_the_Argentinean_version_of_the_Roland_Morris_Disability_Questionnaire_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -