Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Aug; 24(5):668-73.JA

Abstract

This prospective study analyzed computer-assisted surgery (CAS) navigation and conventional instrumentation in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Sixty patients underwent CAS navigation in 1 knee and conventional instrumentation in the contralateral knee randomly. The target zone resided in the reconstructed mechanical axis within a range of 3 degrees varus or valgus. The reconstructed mechanical axes in the CAS navigation group were significantly closer to planned axes than those in the conventional group. Average blood loss in the CAS navigation group was lower, whereas mean tourniquet time was longer than in the conventional group. No surgery-related complications existed in either group. The results indicate that, despite longer operative time, CAS navigation total knee arthroplasty is a safe procedure and outperforms conventional technique in accuracy of leg axes.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chia-Yi, Chang Gung University, Chia Yi, Taiwan.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18534395

Citation

Weng, Yi-Jan, et al. "Comparison of Computer-assisted Navigation and Conventional Instrumentation for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty." The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 24, no. 5, 2009, pp. 668-73.
Weng YJ, Hsu RW, Hsu WH. Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(5):668-73.
Weng, Y. J., Hsu, R. W., & Hsu, W. H. (2009). Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 24(5), 668-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.006
Weng YJ, Hsu RW, Hsu WH. Comparison of Computer-assisted Navigation and Conventional Instrumentation for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(5):668-73. PubMed PMID: 18534395.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty. AU - Weng,Yi-Jan, AU - Hsu,Robert Wen-Wei, AU - Hsu,Wei-Hsiu, Y1 - 2008/06/04/ PY - 2007/07/23/received PY - 2008/03/13/accepted PY - 2008/6/7/pubmed PY - 2009/10/1/medline PY - 2008/6/7/entrez SP - 668 EP - 73 JF - The Journal of arthroplasty JO - J Arthroplasty VL - 24 IS - 5 N2 - This prospective study analyzed computer-assisted surgery (CAS) navigation and conventional instrumentation in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Sixty patients underwent CAS navigation in 1 knee and conventional instrumentation in the contralateral knee randomly. The target zone resided in the reconstructed mechanical axis within a range of 3 degrees varus or valgus. The reconstructed mechanical axes in the CAS navigation group were significantly closer to planned axes than those in the conventional group. Average blood loss in the CAS navigation group was lower, whereas mean tourniquet time was longer than in the conventional group. No surgery-related complications existed in either group. The results indicate that, despite longer operative time, CAS navigation total knee arthroplasty is a safe procedure and outperforms conventional technique in accuracy of leg axes. SN - 1532-8406 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18534395/Comparison_of_computer_assisted_navigation_and_conventional_instrumentation_for_bilateral_total_knee_arthroplasty_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0883-5403(08)00422-1 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -