Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Gonorrhea screening among men who have sex with men: value of multiple anatomic site testing, San Diego, California, 1997-2003.
Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Oct; 35(10):845-8.ST

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that men who have sex with men (MSM) be screened annually for gonorrhea (GC) infection at the urethral, pharyngeal, or rectal site based on recent sexual exposure. This evaluation estimated the proportion of GC infections in MSM that would be missed if only urethral or urine specimens were tested.

METHODS

Culture of specimens from all sites and urethral (or urine) nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) results for gonorrhea were reviewed for all identified MSM attending the San Diego County STD Clinic during 1997-2003.

RESULTS

During the 7-year period, 7333 MSM were tested for GC and 1157 (15.8%) had a positive test result at > or =1 sites. Overall, 10.8% of urethral, 9.8% of rectal, and 4.0% of pharyngeal tests were positive. Among 5812 patients who had a urethral and a rectal or pharyngeal specimen tested, 970 were positive and among those, 369 (38%) had a negative test result in their urethral or urine specimen. Among 163 patients who had only a rectal and/or pharyngeal specimen tested for GC, 16 (9.8%) were positive. If the clinic had tested only urethral or urine specimens, 33% of total gonorrhea cases among MSM [385 (369 + 16) of 1157] would have been missed.

CONCLUSION

GC screening strategies for MSM should include testing of rectal and pharyngeal specimens based on exposure. Given the decline of culture availability, efforts are needed to encourage laboratories to validate NAATs for rectal/pharyngeal specimens, which will likely increase exposure-based screening of MSM.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Public Health Services, Health and Human Services Agency, San Diego, California 92110-3115, USA. robert.gunn@sdcounty.ca.govNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Evaluation Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18607315

Citation

Gunn, Robert A., et al. "Gonorrhea Screening Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Value of Multiple Anatomic Site Testing, San Diego, California, 1997-2003." Sexually Transmitted Diseases, vol. 35, no. 10, 2008, pp. 845-8.
Gunn RA, O'Brien CJ, Lee MA, et al. Gonorrhea screening among men who have sex with men: value of multiple anatomic site testing, San Diego, California, 1997-2003. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35(10):845-8.
Gunn, R. A., O'Brien, C. J., Lee, M. A., & Gilchick, R. A. (2008). Gonorrhea screening among men who have sex with men: value of multiple anatomic site testing, San Diego, California, 1997-2003. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 35(10), 845-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318177ec70
Gunn RA, et al. Gonorrhea Screening Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Value of Multiple Anatomic Site Testing, San Diego, California, 1997-2003. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35(10):845-8. PubMed PMID: 18607315.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Gonorrhea screening among men who have sex with men: value of multiple anatomic site testing, San Diego, California, 1997-2003. AU - Gunn,Robert A, AU - O'Brien,Catherine J, AU - Lee,Marjorie A, AU - Gilchick,Robert A, PY - 2008/7/9/pubmed PY - 2008/10/28/medline PY - 2008/7/9/entrez SP - 845 EP - 8 JF - Sexually transmitted diseases JO - Sex Transm Dis VL - 35 IS - 10 N2 - BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that men who have sex with men (MSM) be screened annually for gonorrhea (GC) infection at the urethral, pharyngeal, or rectal site based on recent sexual exposure. This evaluation estimated the proportion of GC infections in MSM that would be missed if only urethral or urine specimens were tested. METHODS: Culture of specimens from all sites and urethral (or urine) nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) results for gonorrhea were reviewed for all identified MSM attending the San Diego County STD Clinic during 1997-2003. RESULTS: During the 7-year period, 7333 MSM were tested for GC and 1157 (15.8%) had a positive test result at > or =1 sites. Overall, 10.8% of urethral, 9.8% of rectal, and 4.0% of pharyngeal tests were positive. Among 5812 patients who had a urethral and a rectal or pharyngeal specimen tested, 970 were positive and among those, 369 (38%) had a negative test result in their urethral or urine specimen. Among 163 patients who had only a rectal and/or pharyngeal specimen tested for GC, 16 (9.8%) were positive. If the clinic had tested only urethral or urine specimens, 33% of total gonorrhea cases among MSM [385 (369 + 16) of 1157] would have been missed. CONCLUSION: GC screening strategies for MSM should include testing of rectal and pharyngeal specimens based on exposure. Given the decline of culture availability, efforts are needed to encourage laboratories to validate NAATs for rectal/pharyngeal specimens, which will likely increase exposure-based screening of MSM. SN - 1537-4521 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18607315/Gonorrhea_screening_among_men_who_have_sex_with_men:_value_of_multiple_anatomic_site_testing_San_Diego_California_1997_2003_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318177ec70 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -