Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008 Oct; 25(7):920-50.CN

Abstract

The finding that the Ebbinghaus/Titchener illusion deceives perception but not grasping is usually seen as strong evidence for Goodale and Milner's (1992) notion of two parallel visual systems, one being conscious and deceived by the illusion (vision-for-perception) and the other being unconscious and not deceived (vision-for-action). However, this finding is controversial and led to studies with seemingly contradictory results. We argue that these results are not as contradictory as it might seem. Instead, studies consistently show similar effects of the illusion on grasping. The perceptual effects are strongly dependent on the specific perceptual measure employed. If, however, some methodological precautions are used, then these diverse perceptual results can be reconciled and point to a single internal size estimate that is used for perception and for grasping. This suggests that the Ebbinghaus illusion deceives a common representation of object size that is used by perception and action.

Authors+Show Affiliations

University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.No affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18629739

Citation

Franz, Volker H., and Karl R. Gegenfurtner. "Grasping Visual Illusions: Consistent Data and No Dissociation." Cognitive Neuropsychology, vol. 25, no. 7, 2008, pp. 920-50.
Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR. Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008;25(7):920-50.
Franz, V. H., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2008). Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(7), 920-50.
Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR. Grasping Visual Illusions: Consistent Data and No Dissociation. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008;25(7):920-50. PubMed PMID: 18629739.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation. AU - Franz,Volker H, AU - Gegenfurtner,Karl R, Y1 - 2008/06/13/ PY - 2008/7/17/pubmed PY - 2008/7/17/medline PY - 2008/7/17/entrez SP - 920 EP - 50 JF - Cognitive neuropsychology JO - Cogn Neuropsychol VL - 25 IS - 7 N2 - The finding that the Ebbinghaus/Titchener illusion deceives perception but not grasping is usually seen as strong evidence for Goodale and Milner's (1992) notion of two parallel visual systems, one being conscious and deceived by the illusion (vision-for-perception) and the other being unconscious and not deceived (vision-for-action). However, this finding is controversial and led to studies with seemingly contradictory results. We argue that these results are not as contradictory as it might seem. Instead, studies consistently show similar effects of the illusion on grasping. The perceptual effects are strongly dependent on the specific perceptual measure employed. If, however, some methodological precautions are used, then these diverse perceptual results can be reconciled and point to a single internal size estimate that is used for perception and for grasping. This suggests that the Ebbinghaus illusion deceives a common representation of object size that is used by perception and action. SN - 1464-0627 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18629739/Grasping_visual_illusions:_Consistent_data_and_no_dissociation_ L2 - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02643290701862449 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -
Try the Free App:
Prime PubMed app for iOS iPhone iPad
Prime PubMed app for Android
Prime PubMed is provided
free to individuals by:
Unbound Medicine.