Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

[Clinical observation on warming-removing obstruction needling method for treatment of sudden tinnitus and deafness].
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu 2008; 28(5):353-5ZZ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare therapeutic effects of acupuncture at Fengchi (GB 20) as main with warming-removing obstruction needling method and routine acupuncture on sudden tinnitus and deafness.

METHODS

Sixty-two cases were randomly divided into a warming-removing obstruction needling method group (n=32) and a routine acupuncture group (n=30). The warming-removing obstruction needling method group were treated with acupuncture at Fengchi (GB 20) as main point with warming-removing obstruction needling method, in combination with local, distant points of ear with twirling uniform reinforcing-reducing method used; and the routine acupuncture group were treated with acupuncture at local and distant points of ear with twirling uniform reinforcing-reducing method adopted. After treatment for 3 courses, their therapeutic effects were compared and followed-up.

RESULTS

The cured-markedly effective rate, the effective rate and the recurrence rate were 90.6%, 96.9% and 3.4% in the war ming-removing obstruction needling method group, and 60.0%, 80.0% and 22.2% in the routine acupuncture group, with a very significant difference in the cured-markedly effective rate (P<0.01) and with a significant difference in the effective rate and the recurrence rate (P<0.05) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic effect of the warming-removing obstruction needling method group is significantly better than that of the routine acupuncture group with lower recurrence rate after cure.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Acupuncture and Massage, Gansu College of TCM, Lanzhou, China. jjwyw2002@163.com

Pub Type(s)

English Abstract
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

chi

PubMed ID

18652328

Citation

Ji, Jie, and Xiao-Li Fang. "[Clinical Observation On Warming-removing Obstruction Needling Method for Treatment of Sudden Tinnitus and Deafness]." Zhongguo Zhen Jiu = Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion, vol. 28, no. 5, 2008, pp. 353-5.
Ji J, Fang XL. [Clinical observation on warming-removing obstruction needling method for treatment of sudden tinnitus and deafness]. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2008;28(5):353-5.
Ji, J., & Fang, X. L. (2008). [Clinical observation on warming-removing obstruction needling method for treatment of sudden tinnitus and deafness]. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu = Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion, 28(5), pp. 353-5.
Ji J, Fang XL. [Clinical Observation On Warming-removing Obstruction Needling Method for Treatment of Sudden Tinnitus and Deafness]. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2008;28(5):353-5. PubMed PMID: 18652328.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - [Clinical observation on warming-removing obstruction needling method for treatment of sudden tinnitus and deafness]. AU - Ji,Jie, AU - Fang,Xiao-Li, PY - 2008/7/26/pubmed PY - 2008/8/6/medline PY - 2008/7/26/entrez SP - 353 EP - 5 JF - Zhongguo zhen jiu = Chinese acupuncture & moxibustion JO - Zhongguo Zhen Jiu VL - 28 IS - 5 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare therapeutic effects of acupuncture at Fengchi (GB 20) as main with warming-removing obstruction needling method and routine acupuncture on sudden tinnitus and deafness. METHODS: Sixty-two cases were randomly divided into a warming-removing obstruction needling method group (n=32) and a routine acupuncture group (n=30). The warming-removing obstruction needling method group were treated with acupuncture at Fengchi (GB 20) as main point with warming-removing obstruction needling method, in combination with local, distant points of ear with twirling uniform reinforcing-reducing method used; and the routine acupuncture group were treated with acupuncture at local and distant points of ear with twirling uniform reinforcing-reducing method adopted. After treatment for 3 courses, their therapeutic effects were compared and followed-up. RESULTS: The cured-markedly effective rate, the effective rate and the recurrence rate were 90.6%, 96.9% and 3.4% in the war ming-removing obstruction needling method group, and 60.0%, 80.0% and 22.2% in the routine acupuncture group, with a very significant difference in the cured-markedly effective rate (P<0.01) and with a significant difference in the effective rate and the recurrence rate (P<0.05) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The therapeutic effect of the warming-removing obstruction needling method group is significantly better than that of the routine acupuncture group with lower recurrence rate after cure. SN - 0255-2930 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18652328/[Clinical_observation_on_warming_removing_obstruction_needling_method_for_treatment_of_sudden_tinnitus_and_deafness]_ L2 - http://www.diseaseinfosearch.org/result/2125 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -