Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of Harris Benedict and Mifflin-ST Jeor equations with indirect calorimetry in evaluating resting energy expenditure.
Indian J Med Sci 2008; 62(7):283-90IJ

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An understanding of energy expenditure in hospitalized patients is necessary to determine optimal energy supply. The metabolic rate can be measured or estimated by equations, but estimation is by far the most common method.

AIM

This study tests the degree of agreement between measured resting energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry and predicted resting energy expenditure by Harris Benedict and Mifflin-St Jeor equations. Patients were categorized according to sex and diagnosis.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 60 randomly selected patients, aged between 18 and 83 years, resting energy expenditure (REE) was measured by indirect calorimetry and compared with the predicted equations of Harris Benedict and Mifflin-St Jeor.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Statistical analysis was performed by using the method of Bland-Altman, one sample t-test and Pearson's correlation.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between measured and predicted resting energy expenditure by both equations, in all cases as a whole and each group. The only statistically significant difference was seen between measured resting energy expenditure and its predicted equivalent by Mifflin-St equation when patients were categorized according to their sex. Limits of agreements were wide for both equations in all cases and each category so clinical significance was considerable.

CONCLUSIONS

At a group level Harris-Benedict equation is suitable for predicting REE but at an individual level, both equations have wide limits of agreement and clinically important differences in REE would be obtained.

Authors+Show Affiliations

The Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Centre (EMRC) of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Shariati Hospital, North Kargar St., Tehran 1411713137, Iran. saeedhmdphd@hotmail.com

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18688113

Citation

Amirkalali, Bahareh, et al. "Comparison of Harris Benedict and Mifflin-ST Jeor Equations With Indirect Calorimetry in Evaluating Resting Energy Expenditure." Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 62, no. 7, 2008, pp. 283-90.
Amirkalali B, Hosseini S, Heshmat R, et al. Comparison of Harris Benedict and Mifflin-ST Jeor equations with indirect calorimetry in evaluating resting energy expenditure. Indian J Med Sci. 2008;62(7):283-90.
Amirkalali, B., Hosseini, S., Heshmat, R., & Larijani, B. (2008). Comparison of Harris Benedict and Mifflin-ST Jeor equations with indirect calorimetry in evaluating resting energy expenditure. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, 62(7), pp. 283-90.
Amirkalali B, et al. Comparison of Harris Benedict and Mifflin-ST Jeor Equations With Indirect Calorimetry in Evaluating Resting Energy Expenditure. Indian J Med Sci. 2008;62(7):283-90. PubMed PMID: 18688113.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of Harris Benedict and Mifflin-ST Jeor equations with indirect calorimetry in evaluating resting energy expenditure. AU - Amirkalali,Bahareh, AU - Hosseini,Saeed, AU - Heshmat,Ramin, AU - Larijani,Bagher, PY - 2008/8/9/pubmed PY - 2009/7/1/medline PY - 2008/8/9/entrez SP - 283 EP - 90 JF - Indian journal of medical sciences JO - Indian J Med Sci VL - 62 IS - 7 N2 - BACKGROUND: An understanding of energy expenditure in hospitalized patients is necessary to determine optimal energy supply. The metabolic rate can be measured or estimated by equations, but estimation is by far the most common method. AIM: This study tests the degree of agreement between measured resting energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry and predicted resting energy expenditure by Harris Benedict and Mifflin-St Jeor equations. Patients were categorized according to sex and diagnosis. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 60 randomly selected patients, aged between 18 and 83 years, resting energy expenditure (REE) was measured by indirect calorimetry and compared with the predicted equations of Harris Benedict and Mifflin-St Jeor. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis was performed by using the method of Bland-Altman, one sample t-test and Pearson's correlation. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between measured and predicted resting energy expenditure by both equations, in all cases as a whole and each group. The only statistically significant difference was seen between measured resting energy expenditure and its predicted equivalent by Mifflin-St equation when patients were categorized according to their sex. Limits of agreements were wide for both equations in all cases and each category so clinical significance was considerable. CONCLUSIONS: At a group level Harris-Benedict equation is suitable for predicting REE but at an individual level, both equations have wide limits of agreement and clinically important differences in REE would be obtained. SN - 0019-5359 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18688113/Comparison_of_Harris_Benedict_and_Mifflin_ST_Jeor_equations_with_indirect_calorimetry_in_evaluating_resting_energy_expenditure_ L2 - https://medlineplus.gov/healthstatistics.html DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -