Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

National Institutes of Health funding for cardiothoracic surgical research.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Aug; 136(2):392-7; discussion 398-9.JT

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was determine the status of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for cardiothoracic surgery research.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

(1) Funding from the NIH is critical if new procedures and devices are to be developed. (2) The success rate for NIH applications coming from cardiothoracic surgery faculty is thought to be inferior. (3) Per capita numbers of surgical NIH application and awards and application success rate have recently been found to be below the average for the NIH.

METHODS

Application and award data for full-time academic cardiothoracic surgeons were obtained by matching records in the NIH IMPAC II database with membership rosters of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Manpower data were obtained from 1999, 2003, and 2005 reports of the STS/AATS Workforce committee. Society membership was used as a surrogate for investigator experience.

RESULTS

The number of NIH applications has increased steeply in the past 7 years; however, the number of awards has remained constant. This pattern was observed for surgery and cardiothoracic surgery as well. Until 2003, the cardiothoracic surgery application success rate was actually higher than that of surgery and the NIH as a whole (between 25% and 40%). Since then, however, the cardiothoracic surgery application success rate has declined steeply and is now only 14%. NIH applications and awards per 100 cardiothoracic surgeons, although similar to those of surgery, are very much less than the NIH as a whole.

CONCLUSION

Per capita NIH funding of cardiothoracic surgeons is very much less than that of the NIH as a whole. The primary cause is the low per capita number of applications submitted by cardiothoracic surgeons. Junior cardiothoracic faculty should be encouraged to apply for career development awards. However, since the ability to shift cost from clinical to academic faculty is declining, affirmative action from the NIH may be necessary.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. mark.ratcliffe@med.va.govNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18692647

Citation

Ratcliffe, Mark B., et al. "National Institutes of Health Funding for Cardiothoracic Surgical Research." The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 136, no. 2, 2008, pp. 392-7; discussion 398-9.
Ratcliffe MB, Howard C, Mann M, et al. National Institutes of Health funding for cardiothoracic surgical research. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(2):392-7; discussion 398-9.
Ratcliffe, M. B., Howard, C., Mann, M., & del Nido, P. (2008). National Institutes of Health funding for cardiothoracic surgical research. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 136(2), 392-7; discussion 398-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.04.009
Ratcliffe MB, et al. National Institutes of Health Funding for Cardiothoracic Surgical Research. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(2):392-7; discussion 398-9. PubMed PMID: 18692647.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - National Institutes of Health funding for cardiothoracic surgical research. AU - Ratcliffe,Mark B, AU - Howard,Cheryl, AU - Mann,Michael, AU - del Nido,Pedro, Y1 - 2008/06/02/ PY - 2008/03/27/received PY - 2008/04/16/accepted PY - 2008/8/12/pubmed PY - 2008/8/30/medline PY - 2008/8/12/entrez SP - 392-7; discussion 398-9 JF - The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery JO - J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg VL - 136 IS - 2 N2 - OBJECTIVE: Our objective was determine the status of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for cardiothoracic surgery research. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: (1) Funding from the NIH is critical if new procedures and devices are to be developed. (2) The success rate for NIH applications coming from cardiothoracic surgery faculty is thought to be inferior. (3) Per capita numbers of surgical NIH application and awards and application success rate have recently been found to be below the average for the NIH. METHODS: Application and award data for full-time academic cardiothoracic surgeons were obtained by matching records in the NIH IMPAC II database with membership rosters of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Manpower data were obtained from 1999, 2003, and 2005 reports of the STS/AATS Workforce committee. Society membership was used as a surrogate for investigator experience. RESULTS: The number of NIH applications has increased steeply in the past 7 years; however, the number of awards has remained constant. This pattern was observed for surgery and cardiothoracic surgery as well. Until 2003, the cardiothoracic surgery application success rate was actually higher than that of surgery and the NIH as a whole (between 25% and 40%). Since then, however, the cardiothoracic surgery application success rate has declined steeply and is now only 14%. NIH applications and awards per 100 cardiothoracic surgeons, although similar to those of surgery, are very much less than the NIH as a whole. CONCLUSION: Per capita NIH funding of cardiothoracic surgeons is very much less than that of the NIH as a whole. The primary cause is the low per capita number of applications submitted by cardiothoracic surgeons. Junior cardiothoracic faculty should be encouraged to apply for career development awards. However, since the ability to shift cost from clinical to academic faculty is declining, affirmative action from the NIH may be necessary. SN - 1097-685X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18692647/National_Institutes_of_Health_funding_for_cardiothoracic_surgical_research_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022-5223(08)00637-5 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -