Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Glycaemic index of four commercially available breads in Malaysia.
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2009 Sep; 60(6):487-96.IJ

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the blood glucose response and glycaemic index (GI) values of four types of commercially available breads in Malaysia. Twelve healthy volunteers (six men, six women; body mass index, 21.9±1.6 kg/m(2); age, 22.9±1.7 years) participated in this study. The breads tested were multi-grains bread (M-Grains), wholemeal bread (WM), wholemeal bread with oatmeal (WM-Oat) and white bread (WB). The subjects were studied on seven different occasions (four tests for the tested breads and three repeated tests of the reference food) after an overnight fast. Capillary blood samples were taken immediately before (0 min) and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after consumption of the test foods. The blood glucose response was obtained by calculating the incremental area under the curve. The GI values were determined according to the standardized methodology. Our results showed that the M-Grains and WM-Oat could be categorized as intermediate GI while the WM and WB breads were high GI foods, respectively. The GI of M-Grains (56±6.2) and WM-Oat (67±6.9) were significantly lower than the reference food (glucose; GI = 100) (P < 0.05). No significant difference in GI value was seen between the reference food and the GI of WM (85±5.9) and WB (82±6.5) (P > 0.05). Among the tested breads, the GI values of M-Grains and WM-Oat were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than those of WM and WB. There was no relationship between the dietary fibre content of the bread with the incremental area under the curve (r = 0.15, P = 0.15) or their GI values (r = 0.17, P = 0.12), indicating that the GI value of the test breads were unaffected by the fibre content of the breads. The result of this study will provide useful nutritional information for dieticians and the public alike who may prefer low-GI over high-GI foods.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Nutrition & Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University Putra, Malaysia. bnisakmy@yahoo.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

18785052

Citation

Yusof, Barakatun Nisak Mohd, et al. "Glycaemic Index of Four Commercially Available Breads in Malaysia." International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 60, no. 6, 2009, pp. 487-96.
Yusof BN, Abd Talib R, Karim NA, et al. Glycaemic index of four commercially available breads in Malaysia. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2009;60(6):487-96.
Yusof, B. N., Abd Talib, R., Karim, N. A., Kamarudin, N. A., & Arshad, F. (2009). Glycaemic index of four commercially available breads in Malaysia. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 60(6), 487-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637480701804268
Yusof BN, et al. Glycaemic Index of Four Commercially Available Breads in Malaysia. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2009;60(6):487-96. PubMed PMID: 18785052.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Glycaemic index of four commercially available breads in Malaysia. AU - Yusof,Barakatun Nisak Mohd, AU - Abd Talib,Ruzita, AU - Karim,Norimah A, AU - Kamarudin,Nor Azmi, AU - Arshad,Fatimah, PY - 2008/9/12/entrez PY - 2008/9/12/pubmed PY - 2013/9/4/medline SP - 487 EP - 96 JF - International journal of food sciences and nutrition JO - Int J Food Sci Nutr VL - 60 IS - 6 N2 - This study was carried out to determine the blood glucose response and glycaemic index (GI) values of four types of commercially available breads in Malaysia. Twelve healthy volunteers (six men, six women; body mass index, 21.9±1.6 kg/m(2); age, 22.9±1.7 years) participated in this study. The breads tested were multi-grains bread (M-Grains), wholemeal bread (WM), wholemeal bread with oatmeal (WM-Oat) and white bread (WB). The subjects were studied on seven different occasions (four tests for the tested breads and three repeated tests of the reference food) after an overnight fast. Capillary blood samples were taken immediately before (0 min) and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after consumption of the test foods. The blood glucose response was obtained by calculating the incremental area under the curve. The GI values were determined according to the standardized methodology. Our results showed that the M-Grains and WM-Oat could be categorized as intermediate GI while the WM and WB breads were high GI foods, respectively. The GI of M-Grains (56±6.2) and WM-Oat (67±6.9) were significantly lower than the reference food (glucose; GI = 100) (P < 0.05). No significant difference in GI value was seen between the reference food and the GI of WM (85±5.9) and WB (82±6.5) (P > 0.05). Among the tested breads, the GI values of M-Grains and WM-Oat were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than those of WM and WB. There was no relationship between the dietary fibre content of the bread with the incremental area under the curve (r = 0.15, P = 0.15) or their GI values (r = 0.17, P = 0.12), indicating that the GI value of the test breads were unaffected by the fibre content of the breads. The result of this study will provide useful nutritional information for dieticians and the public alike who may prefer low-GI over high-GI foods. SN - 1465-3478 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18785052/Glycaemic_index_of_four_commercially_available_breads_in_Malaysia_ L2 - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09637480701804268 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -