Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Perforation during colonoscopy is a rare but severe complication. The aim of this study was to assess the time management and laparoscopic therapy of this complication and to evaluate patient outcomes.
METHODOLOGY
A retrospective analysis was done on 15 patients operated for a perforation from colonoscopy between January 2000 and December 2006.
RESULTS
Three perforations occurred during diagnostic and 12 perforations during interventional colonoscopy. Two perforations occurred as transmural thermal injury to the colon wall. Peritonitis was found in 4 cases and significantly correlated with the mean time between perforation and operation. Twelve perforations were oversewn laparoscopically and 3 perforations were oversewn by laparotomy. After laparoscopic treatment, hospital stay was significantly shorter than after laparotomy. One patient had a postoperative wound infection, mortality was 0%.
CONCLUSIONS
Laparoscopic oversewing is a safe and effective method in the treatment of perforation from colonoscopy. Optimizing the time range between perforation and laparoscopic therapy results in a better outcome for the patients.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing time management after perforation by colonoscopy results in better outcome for the patients.
AU - Rumstadt,Bernhard,
AU - Schilling,Dieter,
PY - 2008/9/18/pubmed
PY - 2009/1/14/medline
PY - 2008/9/18/entrez
SP - 1308
EP - 10
JF - Hepato-gastroenterology
JO - Hepatogastroenterology
VL - 55
IS - 85
N2 - BACKGROUND/AIMS: Perforation during colonoscopy is a rare but severe complication. The aim of this study was to assess the time management and laparoscopic therapy of this complication and to evaluate patient outcomes. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective analysis was done on 15 patients operated for a perforation from colonoscopy between January 2000 and December 2006. RESULTS: Three perforations occurred during diagnostic and 12 perforations during interventional colonoscopy. Two perforations occurred as transmural thermal injury to the colon wall. Peritonitis was found in 4 cases and significantly correlated with the mean time between perforation and operation. Twelve perforations were oversewn laparoscopically and 3 perforations were oversewn by laparotomy. After laparoscopic treatment, hospital stay was significantly shorter than after laparotomy. One patient had a postoperative wound infection, mortality was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic oversewing is a safe and effective method in the treatment of perforation from colonoscopy. Optimizing the time range between perforation and laparoscopic therapy results in a better outcome for the patients.
SN - 0172-6390
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/18795678/Optimizing_time_management_after_perforation_by_colonoscopy_results_in_better_outcome_for_the_patients_
L2 - https://medlineplus.gov/colonicdiseases.html
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -