Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction.
J Endod. 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3.JE

Abstract

This study compared digital and digitized panoramic radiographs to detect incipient periapical lesions using the digital subtraction radiography (DSR) technique. Bone defects were created in 77 apical sites of dried human mandibles through the application of 70% perchloric acid. Conventional and digital radiographs were obtained twice at time zero and 2, 4, and 6 hours after application of the acid solution. Conventional radiographs were digitized by using the same attributes than direct digital radiographs. The baseline images were subtracted of the negative control and experimental groups and assessed by an experienced and blinded observer who assigned score 0 (normal) or 1 (mineral loss) to each image. The sensitivity of both modalities was statistically different in relation to experimental times. The percentage of correct responses significantly increased regarding experimental times. The specificity was high both for digitized and digital images. DSR of panoramic images, both digitized and digital, allows for the diagnosis of incipient-simulated periapical lesions with no differences in their performance.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Graduate Program in Clinical Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19026882

Citation

Miguens, Sergio Augusto Quevedo, et al. "A Comparison Between Panoramic Digital and Digitized Images to Detect Simulated Periapical Lesions Using Radiographic Subtraction." Journal of Endodontics, vol. 34, no. 12, 2008, pp. 1500-3.
Miguens SA, Veeck EB, Fontanella VR, et al. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction. J Endod. 2008;34(12):1500-3.
Miguens, S. A., Veeck, E. B., Fontanella, V. R., & da Costa, N. P. (2008). A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction. Journal of Endodontics, 34(12), 1500-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.09.006
Miguens SA, et al. A Comparison Between Panoramic Digital and Digitized Images to Detect Simulated Periapical Lesions Using Radiographic Subtraction. J Endod. 2008;34(12):1500-3. PubMed PMID: 19026882.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction. AU - Miguens,Sergio Augusto Quevedo,Jr AU - Veeck,Elaine Bauer, AU - Fontanella,Vania Regina Camargo, AU - da Costa,Nilza Pereira, Y1 - 2008/10/18/ PY - 2008/05/18/received PY - 2008/09/07/revised PY - 2008/09/08/accepted PY - 2008/11/26/pubmed PY - 2009/4/1/medline PY - 2008/11/26/entrez SP - 1500 EP - 3 JF - Journal of endodontics JO - J Endod VL - 34 IS - 12 N2 - This study compared digital and digitized panoramic radiographs to detect incipient periapical lesions using the digital subtraction radiography (DSR) technique. Bone defects were created in 77 apical sites of dried human mandibles through the application of 70% perchloric acid. Conventional and digital radiographs were obtained twice at time zero and 2, 4, and 6 hours after application of the acid solution. Conventional radiographs were digitized by using the same attributes than direct digital radiographs. The baseline images were subtracted of the negative control and experimental groups and assessed by an experienced and blinded observer who assigned score 0 (normal) or 1 (mineral loss) to each image. The sensitivity of both modalities was statistically different in relation to experimental times. The percentage of correct responses significantly increased regarding experimental times. The specificity was high both for digitized and digital images. DSR of panoramic images, both digitized and digital, allows for the diagnosis of incipient-simulated periapical lesions with no differences in their performance. SN - 1878-3554 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19026882/A_comparison_between_panoramic_digital_and_digitized_images_to_detect_simulated_periapical_lesions_using_radiographic_subtraction_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -