Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9.EJ

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different surface conditioning methods. InVu Readi-Base ceramic brackets were bonded to 100 human premolars with different etching protocols. With conventional method (CM), the teeth were etched with 37 per cent phosphoric acid for 30 seconds, while Transbond Plus self-etching primer (SEP) was applied as recommended by the manufacturer. SBS testing was performed on 25 samples of each group while the remaining 25 samples of each group were subjected to plier or machine debonding after thermocycling for 1000 cycles. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was used to determine the amount of composite resin on the enamel. Statistical analysis included Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests and Weibull analysis. No significant difference was observed between the CM (9.22 MPa) and SEP (9.04 MPa) groups (P=0.684). ARI scores of machine and plier debonding for both groups showed a significant difference (P <or= 0.0001). Debonding with pliers showed a pronounced number of ARI scores of 3 for both groups. Polymer mesh base fractures were observed for both groups. Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed between the groups (chi(2)=4.304, P=0.230). The results of this in vitro study are encouraging, since, for the majority of specimens, all of the residual adhesive remained on the enamel surface. This type of debonding pattern has the advantage of protecting the enamel surface. Nevertheless, the base fractures at the ceramic/polymer interface might necessitate modifications in debonding strategy.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ondokuz Mayis, Samsun, Turkey. turkset@superonline.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19164413

Citation

Elekdag-Turk, Selma, et al. "Debonding Characteristics of a Polymer Mesh Base Ceramic Bracket Bonded With Two Different Conditioning Methods." European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 31, no. 1, 2009, pp. 84-9.
Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D, Ozkalayci N, et al. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(1):84-9.
Elekdag-Turk, S., Isci, D., Ozkalayci, N., & Turk, T. (2009). Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods. European Journal of Orthodontics, 31(1), 84-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn067
Elekdag-Turk S, et al. Debonding Characteristics of a Polymer Mesh Base Ceramic Bracket Bonded With Two Different Conditioning Methods. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(1):84-9. PubMed PMID: 19164413.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods. AU - Elekdag-Turk,Selma, AU - Isci,Devrim, AU - Ozkalayci,Nurhat, AU - Turk,Tamer, PY - 2009/1/24/entrez PY - 2009/1/24/pubmed PY - 2009/4/25/medline SP - 84 EP - 9 JF - European journal of orthodontics JO - Eur J Orthod VL - 31 IS - 1 N2 - The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different surface conditioning methods. InVu Readi-Base ceramic brackets were bonded to 100 human premolars with different etching protocols. With conventional method (CM), the teeth were etched with 37 per cent phosphoric acid for 30 seconds, while Transbond Plus self-etching primer (SEP) was applied as recommended by the manufacturer. SBS testing was performed on 25 samples of each group while the remaining 25 samples of each group were subjected to plier or machine debonding after thermocycling for 1000 cycles. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was used to determine the amount of composite resin on the enamel. Statistical analysis included Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests and Weibull analysis. No significant difference was observed between the CM (9.22 MPa) and SEP (9.04 MPa) groups (P=0.684). ARI scores of machine and plier debonding for both groups showed a significant difference (P <or= 0.0001). Debonding with pliers showed a pronounced number of ARI scores of 3 for both groups. Polymer mesh base fractures were observed for both groups. Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed between the groups (chi(2)=4.304, P=0.230). The results of this in vitro study are encouraging, since, for the majority of specimens, all of the residual adhesive remained on the enamel surface. This type of debonding pattern has the advantage of protecting the enamel surface. Nevertheless, the base fractures at the ceramic/polymer interface might necessitate modifications in debonding strategy. SN - 1460-2210 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19164413/Debonding_characteristics_of_a_polymer_mesh_base_ceramic_bracket_bonded_with_two_different_conditioning_methods_ L2 - https://academic.oup.com/ejo/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ejo/cjn067 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -