Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Removal of arsenic from water: effect of calcium ions on As(III) removal in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process.
Water Res. 2009 Dec; 43(20):5119-28.WR

Abstract

A novel KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process was developed in this study for As(III) removal. The optimum As(III) removal was achieved at a permanganate dosage of 18.6muM. At the optimum dosage of permanganate, the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process was much more efficient than the KMnO(4)-Fe(III) process for As(III) removal by 15-38% at pH 5-9. The great difference in As(III) removal in these two processes was not ascribed to the uptake of arsenic by the MnO(2) formed in situ but to the different properties of conventional Fe(III) and the Fe(III) formed in situ. It was found that the presence of Ca(2+) had limited effects on As(III) removal under acidic conditions but resulted in a significant increase in As(III) removal under neutral and alkaline conditions in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process. Moreover, the effects of Ca(2+) on As(III) removal in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process were greater at lower permanganate dosage when Fe(II) was not completely oxidized by permanganate. This study revealed that the improvement of As(III) removal at pH 7-9 in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process by Ca(2+) was associated with three reasons: (1) the specific adsorption of Ca(2+) increased the surface charge; (2) the formation of amorphous calcium carbonate and calcite precipitate that could co-precipitate arsenate; (3) the introduction of calcium resulted in more precipitated ferrous hydroxide or ferric hydroxide. On the other hand, the enhancement of arsenic removal by Ca(2+) under acidic conditions was ascribed to the increase of Fe retained in the precipitate. FTIR tests demonstrated that As(III) was removed as arsenate by forming monodentate complex with Fe(III) formed in situ in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process when KMnO(4) was applied at 18.6muM. The strength of the "non-surface complexed" As-O bonds of the precipitated arsenate species was enhanced by the presence of Ca(2+) and the complexation reactions of arsenate with Fe(III) formed in situ in the presence or absence of Ca(2+) were proposed.

Authors+Show Affiliations

State Key Lab of Urban Water Resource and Environment (HIT), Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, PR China. hitgxh@126.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19201439

Citation

Guan, Xiaohong, et al. "Removal of Arsenic From Water: Effect of Calcium Ions On As(III) Removal in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) Process." Water Research, vol. 43, no. 20, 2009, pp. 5119-28.
Guan X, Ma J, Dong H, et al. Removal of arsenic from water: effect of calcium ions on As(III) removal in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process. Water Res. 2009;43(20):5119-28.
Guan, X., Ma, J., Dong, H., & Jiang, L. (2009). Removal of arsenic from water: effect of calcium ions on As(III) removal in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process. Water Research, 43(20), 5119-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.054
Guan X, et al. Removal of Arsenic From Water: Effect of Calcium Ions On As(III) Removal in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) Process. Water Res. 2009;43(20):5119-28. PubMed PMID: 19201439.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Removal of arsenic from water: effect of calcium ions on As(III) removal in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process. AU - Guan,Xiaohong, AU - Ma,Jun, AU - Dong,Haoran, AU - Jiang,Li, Y1 - 2009/01/20/ PY - 2008/09/23/received PY - 2008/12/05/revised PY - 2008/12/30/accepted PY - 2009/2/10/entrez PY - 2009/2/10/pubmed PY - 2010/2/20/medline SP - 5119 EP - 28 JF - Water research JO - Water Res VL - 43 IS - 20 N2 - A novel KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process was developed in this study for As(III) removal. The optimum As(III) removal was achieved at a permanganate dosage of 18.6muM. At the optimum dosage of permanganate, the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process was much more efficient than the KMnO(4)-Fe(III) process for As(III) removal by 15-38% at pH 5-9. The great difference in As(III) removal in these two processes was not ascribed to the uptake of arsenic by the MnO(2) formed in situ but to the different properties of conventional Fe(III) and the Fe(III) formed in situ. It was found that the presence of Ca(2+) had limited effects on As(III) removal under acidic conditions but resulted in a significant increase in As(III) removal under neutral and alkaline conditions in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process. Moreover, the effects of Ca(2+) on As(III) removal in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process were greater at lower permanganate dosage when Fe(II) was not completely oxidized by permanganate. This study revealed that the improvement of As(III) removal at pH 7-9 in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process by Ca(2+) was associated with three reasons: (1) the specific adsorption of Ca(2+) increased the surface charge; (2) the formation of amorphous calcium carbonate and calcite precipitate that could co-precipitate arsenate; (3) the introduction of calcium resulted in more precipitated ferrous hydroxide or ferric hydroxide. On the other hand, the enhancement of arsenic removal by Ca(2+) under acidic conditions was ascribed to the increase of Fe retained in the precipitate. FTIR tests demonstrated that As(III) was removed as arsenate by forming monodentate complex with Fe(III) formed in situ in the KMnO(4)-Fe(II) process when KMnO(4) was applied at 18.6muM. The strength of the "non-surface complexed" As-O bonds of the precipitated arsenate species was enhanced by the presence of Ca(2+) and the complexation reactions of arsenate with Fe(III) formed in situ in the presence or absence of Ca(2+) were proposed. SN - 1879-2448 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19201439/Removal_of_arsenic_from_water:_effect_of_calcium_ions_on_As_III__removal_in_the_KMnO_4__Fe_II__process_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0043-1354(09)00007-4 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -