Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Effects of aerobic or aerobic and resistance training on cardiorespiratory and skeletal muscle function in heart failure: a randomized controlled pilot trial.
Clin Rehabil. 2009 Mar; 23(3):207-16.CR

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examined the effects of different training modalities on exercise capacity (Vo(2peak)), systolic function, muscular strength and endurance and quality of life in heart failure patients.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Cardiac rehabilitation centre in Canada.

SUBJECTS

Forty-two individuals with heart failure (62 +/- 12 years; New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes I-III).

INTERVENTIONS

Aerobic training (n = 14), combined aerobic and resistance training (n = 15) or usual care (n = 13) three times per week for 12 weeks.

MAIN MEASURES

(1) Vo(2peak) measured by symptom-limited graded exercise test on cycle ergometer; (2) systolic function assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography; (3) muscular strength and muscular endurance measured by one-repetition maximum procedure; and (4) quality of life assessed by questionnaires.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, neither aerobic nor combined aerobic and resistance training significantly improved Vo(2peak), systolic function or quality of life compared with usual care. However, combined aerobic and resistance training significantly improved upper extremity strength (40.7 (14.0)-48.5 (16.0) kg, P<0.05) and muscular endurance (5.7 (2.7)-11.6 (7.6) reps, P<0.05) compared with aerobic training or usual care. In compliant participants (exercise adherence 80%), Vo(2peak) increased in the aerobic group (16.9 (6.0)-19.0 (6.8), P= 0.026) and tended to increase in the combined training group (15.9 (5.0)-17.6 (5.6), P= 0.058) compared with usual care. Quality of life was improved in the aerobic group only.

CONCLUSIONS

Both aerobic and combined aerobic and resistance training are effective interventions to improve Vo(2peak) in compliant heart failure patients. Combined training may be more effective in improving muscle strength and endurance.

Links

Publisher Full Text (DOI)

Authors+Show Affiliations

Mandic S
Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. mandic.sandra@gmail.com
Tymchak W
No affiliation info available
Kim D
No affiliation info available
Daub B
No affiliation info available
Quinney HA
No affiliation info available
Taylor D
No affiliation info available
Al-Kurtass S
No affiliation info available
Haykowsky MJ
No affiliation info available

MeSH

AgedCombined Modality TherapyExercise ToleranceFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthMuscle, SkeletalOxygen ConsumptionPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeResistance TrainingStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, Left

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

19218296

Citation

Mandic, Sandra, et al. "Effects of Aerobic or Aerobic and Resistance Training On Cardiorespiratory and Skeletal Muscle Function in Heart Failure: a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial." Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 23, no. 3, 2009, pp. 207-16.
Mandic S, Tymchak W, Kim D, et al. Effects of aerobic or aerobic and resistance training on cardiorespiratory and skeletal muscle function in heart failure: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(3):207-16.
Mandic, S., Tymchak, W., Kim, D., Daub, B., Quinney, H. A., Taylor, D., Al-Kurtass, S., & Haykowsky, M. J. (2009). Effects of aerobic or aerobic and resistance training on cardiorespiratory and skeletal muscle function in heart failure: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23(3), 207-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508095362
Mandic S, et al. Effects of Aerobic or Aerobic and Resistance Training On Cardiorespiratory and Skeletal Muscle Function in Heart Failure: a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(3):207-16. PubMed PMID: 19218296.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Effects of aerobic or aerobic and resistance training on cardiorespiratory and skeletal muscle function in heart failure: a randomized controlled pilot trial. AU - Mandic,Sandra, AU - Tymchak,Wayne, AU - Kim,Daniel, AU - Daub,Bill, AU - Quinney,H Arthur, AU - Taylor,Dylan, AU - Al-Kurtass,Suhaib, AU - Haykowsky,Mark J, PY - 2009/2/17/entrez PY - 2009/2/17/pubmed PY - 2009/5/29/medline SP - 207 EP - 16 JF - Clinical rehabilitation JO - Clin Rehabil VL - 23 IS - 3 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To examined the effects of different training modalities on exercise capacity (Vo(2peak)), systolic function, muscular strength and endurance and quality of life in heart failure patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Cardiac rehabilitation centre in Canada. SUBJECTS: Forty-two individuals with heart failure (62 +/- 12 years; New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes I-III). INTERVENTIONS: Aerobic training (n = 14), combined aerobic and resistance training (n = 15) or usual care (n = 13) three times per week for 12 weeks. MAIN MEASURES: (1) Vo(2peak) measured by symptom-limited graded exercise test on cycle ergometer; (2) systolic function assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography; (3) muscular strength and muscular endurance measured by one-repetition maximum procedure; and (4) quality of life assessed by questionnaires. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, neither aerobic nor combined aerobic and resistance training significantly improved Vo(2peak), systolic function or quality of life compared with usual care. However, combined aerobic and resistance training significantly improved upper extremity strength (40.7 (14.0)-48.5 (16.0) kg, P<0.05) and muscular endurance (5.7 (2.7)-11.6 (7.6) reps, P<0.05) compared with aerobic training or usual care. In compliant participants (exercise adherence 80%), Vo(2peak) increased in the aerobic group (16.9 (6.0)-19.0 (6.8), P= 0.026) and tended to increase in the combined training group (15.9 (5.0)-17.6 (5.6), P= 0.058) compared with usual care. Quality of life was improved in the aerobic group only. CONCLUSIONS: Both aerobic and combined aerobic and resistance training are effective interventions to improve Vo(2peak) in compliant heart failure patients. Combined training may be more effective in improving muscle strength and endurance. SN - 0269-2155 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/19218296/Effects_of_aerobic_or_aerobic_and_resistance_training_on_cardiorespiratory_and_skeletal_muscle_function_in_heart_failure:_a_randomized_controlled_pilot_trial_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -